Jason's Reviews > World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War

World War Z by Max Brooks
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
4426615
's review

really liked it
bookshelves: for-kindle, 2013, reviewed

ZOMG!

The first time I ever saw that chat acronym my brain immediately registered zombie. Is that weird? I mean, I figured out pretty quickly that the acronym is nothing more than a joke, a mere play on words (so to speak) made at the expense of lazy n00bs whose left fingers slip off the shift key in an attempt to type, “OMG!” But somehow that initial association has stuck with me, as even now when I see someone type it (and usually it’s Ceridwen, Queen of Internet Memes, doing it ironically), I think of the undead. Or when I’m walking alone at night and hear a scraping shuffle and a familiar guttural moan, and some cold, rotting fingers fall lazily onto my left shoulder, my immediate reaction is never anything short of an instinctually exclaimed, “ZOMG!”

Shudder.

So yeah, this rating is no accidental slip of the Apple trackpad; World War Z really is 4-star material. Instead of presenting a been-there-done-that narrative wherein a group of protagonists fall prey to a zombie epidemic, whose lives change with shifting priorities, whose outlook becomes fundamentally survivalist, and who ultimately learn to cope with their situation and depend on themselves and each other to combat the swarms of undead infesting their world, Max Brooks takes a different tack. Here, we get Bolaño-style interviews with key political and military figures from across the globe who are involved in the conflict, along with individual accounts of those who have survived the epidemic. It is a cross-sectional human-interest look at what occurred at the onset of the epidemic, who failed to heed the warning signs and why, who was responsible for its spread and how, and what the world did—both on a grand scale as well as in Joe the Plumber’s backyard—to tackle it.

And tackle it they do. Essentially a “current events” book, this is not meant to project the possibilities of a distant future. It is the here and now of a planetary disaster with painstaking attention paid to the details of not only the epidemic’s spread, but also to the practical logistics encountered on the path to its defeat. The stories are short, but effective. And like Bolaño’s interviews, there is a uniformity in their voice (even with interviewees hailing from different countries), which could be seen as a failure on Brooks’s part, but it nonetheless worked for me. Brooks has a lot to say in this novel, from opinions on American foreign policy to a belief in the indefatigable spirit of humanity, and—ZOMG!—he says it well.
57 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read World War Z.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

February 13, 2011 – Shelved
April 7, 2012 – Shelved as: for-kindle
Started Reading
July 15, 2013 – Shelved as: 2013
July 15, 2013 – Finished Reading
July 16, 2013 – Shelved as: reviewed

Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by El (new) - rated it 3 stars

El Bolaño did it better and he did it without zombies. The "uniformity", as you say, was my biggest beef with this book. I felt The Savage Detectives was done more convincingly.

But at least you didn't mention Brad Pitt, so thank you for that.


Jason Yeah, I don't know that I'll see the movie.

I like how Max Brooks also had something to say about Howard Stern surviving the zombie war. WTF is up with THAT?!!1


message 3: by El (new) - rated it 3 stars

El Hah, yeah, I forgot about that. Howard Stern is a cockroach, so I guess that makes some sense.

I don't understand the previews for the movie AT ALL. It doesn't seem to match the book even remotely. Whatever, I'll catch it on TNT some day, maybe, like if I have the flu or really bad cramps or something.


message 4: by Marieke (new)

Marieke I'm still reeling from the realization that Max Brooks is the progeny of Mel Brooks and Ann Bancroft. I'm dumb like that.


Jason Marieke wrote: "I'm still reeling from the realization that Max Brooks is the progeny of Mel Brooks and Ann Bancroft. I'm dumb like that."

I only learned this recently, too!


message 6: by [deleted user] (new)

I never do anything ironically, as I have an aversion to adverbs. But yes! ZOMG!

I almost saw the movie this weekend, but we were at the drive in, where it was the third movie, and the kids were like, we're trying to sleep! We're going to be scarred for life! Fine. Sigh. It's going to be a shitshow, but I can't help myself.


Jason Three-movie drive-in??! Wow, that's a lot of film viewage.

The only thing tempting me to see it is that we're currently in the middle of the worst heat wave we've had since our last one, and movie theaters are air conditioned.


message 8: by [deleted user] (new)

It is. I haven't made it all through the third in a long time.

We're in the middle of some serious hot too. It makes everything smell bad.


Jason It makes me mildly unhappy.


message 10: by Sarah (new)

Sarah For those curious, Ive seen the movie and it was entertaining enough. The only thing it has in common with its source material is, I have heard, the title. The movie is more like a prequel to the book.

And I couldn't even finish The Savage Detectives.


Jason I can see people not being into TSD. It didn't strike me as something that would be universally beloved. (I loved it, though.)

Are you going to read this one?


Jenn "Awww Yeaaahhh" Sarah wrote: "For those curious, Ive seen the movie and it was entertaining enough. The only thing it has in common with its source material is, I have heard, the title. The movie is more like a prequel to the b..."

I loved the movie. But sometimes I am easy to please. Especially when it comes to (good) zombie movies.


message 13: by Sarah (new)

Sarah I dunno. I'm not really a zombie fan, or a Bolaño fan (if this is so Bolañoesque). The socio-political commentary sounds interesting though.


message 14: by mark (new) - rated it 4 stars

mark monday Jason wrote: "Yeah, I don't know that I'll see the movie."

I like the movie. I was surprised that I liked the movie. the Jerusalem sequence was amazing.


Jason There were some sequences in the book that I thought were pretty brilliant and could imagine translating well to the big screen, but they all take place in different places an to different characters, so I don't know if/how the film would capture that because it's about one dude.


message 16: by Steve (new)

Steve Great write-up, my friend! That sounds better than I would have thought. I guess I need to work on these prejudices of mine against Zs.

As an aside apropos of very little, I tried for a while to figure out what ZOMG might mean. The best I came up with was "Zounds! Oh My God!", but that didn't seem likely. The Shakespeare quoting crowd doesn't overlap much with the OMGers.


Jason We both need to work on our prejudices! I wasn't expecting all that much from this book, but I was pleasantly surprised; you might want to give it a shot. Because it isn't really about the zombies. They're just...there, peripherally. It's about humanity and how it reacts, and mobilizes, and prepares, and screws up. It didn't have to be a zombie outbreak, either. It could have been something else. Although the zombies do tend to give the whole thing a unique spin that other apocalyptic events wouldn't.

Steve wrote: "As an aside apropos of very little, I tried for a while to figure out what ZOMG might mean."

Dude. Urbandictionary dot com. I use it for everything when I want to sound like I'm hip.

Do people still say "hip"?


message 18: by Steve (new)

Steve All I know from the past is that it's hip to be square. It doesn't necessarily follow that it's square to be hip.

I do know about the urban dictionary, Jason, despite my generation's typical cluelessness about something so, uh, hip(?). But I like to test myself first trying to guess. BTW, I noticed definition #6 under ZOMG was "Zombies! OMG!"


Jason Steve wrote: "BTW, I noticed definition #6 under ZOMG was "Zombies! OMG!""

ZOMG!


back to top