Jump to content

User talk:Hawkeye7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

This Month in GLAM: May 2024

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Bugle: Issue 218, June 2024

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-24

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of John S. McCain Sr.

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John S. McCain Sr. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:04, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-25

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:46, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]
Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]

Apollogetticax (talk) 16:58, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CAPTAIN RAJU, The Herald, and Apollogetticax: Wow. It has been nearly 20 years. Thanks guys. Best wishes to you too. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:11, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-26

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Lee Fisher scheduled for TFA

[edit]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 24 August 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by user:dying, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi Hawkeye7, I was going through the featured pictures list from WPMH. I saw that this list by the project doesn't have any pictures promoted to FP after 15 July 2022. Would it be ok if I added these myself, or is there some procedure to do so? Also, what is the pattern of listing the images on that page, is it chronological? Thanks in advance. Matarisvan (talk) 16:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. The FP is not updated by the Bot, so I guess that whoever was updating the list must have left. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

[edit]

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

[edit]

It was a pleasant surprise to your moniker, how are you keeping? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 22:13, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will be at Wikimania in August. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:40, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Tinian

[edit]

Hi Hawkeye7, I was just going to put the Battle of Saipan up for Featured Article Review today, but saw you already put up the battle of Tinian. (My original goal was to have it featured by June 15, but didn't realize the casual rate of the A article review process.) I'll hold off for a month, as having more than one Marianas project may split attention. I'll have more time in August to be more responsive as well. If the Tinian article needs help in August, let me know what I can do to help out. Wtfiv (talk) 20:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A class didn't used to be like that, but there are not so many editors around these days. One thing you can do to help is provide a review. Just stating that you reviewed at A-class and believe it meets FAC is okay. I will have very little time to work on it from early August until mid-September. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good. It sounds like A class could use more review help. Once things settle down, I'll try to pitch in there. The toughest part is trying to give meaningful feedback on some of the more esoteric topics. Wtfiv (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-27

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ernest J. King

[edit]

On 2 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ernest J. King, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that it was said Admiral Ernest J. King (pictured) was so tough he shaved with a blowtorch? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ernest J. King. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ernest J. King), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Ganesha811 (talk) 00:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 32,632 views (1,359.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations from the Military History Project

[edit]
Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 6 reviews between April and June 2024. Donner60 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 05:06, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

[edit]

Tech News: 2024-28

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Matterhorn

[edit]

I read the main article up to the target selection subheading. This sentence is in the final paragraph of that topic: "The JWPC also considered targeting, but favored shipping and the oil industry, which could more easily be attacked from bases in Australia." It seems to me that something is missing from this sentence after "targeting". If so, do you know or have information that can show what it is? Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 23:21, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is missing. I will re-phrase to make it clearer. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: June 2024

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Bugle: Issue 219, July 2024

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Let us know if that doesn't work for you. - Dank (push to talk) 16:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-29

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you today for Hanford Engineer Works, introduced: "This article was split from Hanford Site. During the FAR of Hanford Site, I decided to create a new article on the World War II establishment. This brings it into line with the articles on Los Alamos, Berkeley and Oak Ridge, all of which have subarticles on their role in the Manhattan Project. The sources complain about how Hanford has been overlooked compared with Los Alamos and Oak Ridge."! - On the same page: a Mozart opera, an article by many. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for your share in John Glenn, introduced (in 2018): "Six Distinguished Flying Crosses, eighteen Air Medals. First American to orbit the Earth. Four-time Ohio senator. Oldest person to fly in space. This article covers the good and the bad of his life."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Today's story is about a photographer who took iconic pictures, especially View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9/11, yesterday's was a great mezzo, and on Thursday we watched a sublime ballerina. If that's not enough my talk offers chamber music from two amazing concerts. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Operation Matterhorn logistics you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 15:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of John S. McCain Sr.

[edit]

The article John S. McCain Sr. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John S. McCain Sr. for comments about the article, and Talk:John S. McCain Sr./GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 10:46, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Operation Matterhorn logistics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Operation Matterhorn logistics and Talk:Operation Matterhorn logistics/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 15:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John S. McCain Sr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stars and Stripes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

[edit]

Tech News: 2024-30

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Crossroads

[edit]

Hello! I have a question about the table with sunken ships during the Baker test (Operation_Crossroads#Baker_target_array).

1) I didn't find in the book (Delgado, James P. (1991), The Archeology of the Atomic Bomb: A Submerged Cultural Resources Assessment of the Sunken Fleet of Operation Crossroads at Bikini and Kwajalein Atoll Lagoons) the distances from the ships to point zero for the Baker test (only for the Able test).

2) According to the attached map, the distance from USS Arkansas to point zero is closer to 300 yards than the 170 yards indicated in the table.

3) I found a report (https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD0367496.pdf) on the Baker test and in it (page 280) some distances coincide with the table, and some do not (in particular, for Arkansas a distance of 259 yards is given).

Because I don’t understand where the numbers in the table come from, I can’t tell if they are correct or wrong. Could you help? Karavadgoo (talk) 20:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Footnote 68 says: "Data in the table and the map come from Delgado (1991). The Able map is on p. 16, the Baker map on p. 17, and ship damage and distances on pp. 86–87." Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delgado is available for download from Commons. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I downloaded Delgado. But on the indicated pages (pp. 87 - 90 actually) I found data only on distances for test Able, but not Baker.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1e/The_Archeology_of_the_Atomic_Bomb%2C_National_Park_Service%2C_Santa_Fe%2C_New_Mexico%2C_1991_by_Delgado%2C_James_P.%2C_et_al._-_NNPS_903_D160_-38840-pg0000.pdf Karavadgoo (talk) 06:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I almost figured out the issue. The link to Delgado appeared in 2008 (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Crossroads&oldid=253024309). And the original comment was: "Data in the table and the map come from Delgado, Archeology of the Atomic Bomb. The Able map is on p 16, the Baker map on p 17, and ship damage and distances on pp 86-136. The full text of this reference is posted on the Internet (see external links below) with the unfortunate omission of the key to ship numbers in the array maps, rendering the maps useless without access to the book in hard copy."
Indeed, pages 86 - 136 describe individual ships in detail. And sometimes the distances from point 0 at the moment of explosion are indicated for them (and sometimes only the distance from point 0 to their resting place). But, for example, for the USS Arkansas, I never found the required distance (170 yards from article table) on these pages (only 170 feet from the surface of the water at the place of sinking). I propose replacing the distances in the table of the article with distances taken from the report (https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD0367496.pdf pp. 280-281), which most likely was the primary source for Delgado Karavadgoo (talk) 06:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, it’s more pleasant to use the Delgado's book at another link: https://www.nps.gov/parkhistory/online_books/swcrc/37/chap4.htm Karavadgoo (talk) 06:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Operation Matterhorn logistics you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Operation Matterhorn logistics for comments about the article, and Talk:Operation Matterhorn logistics/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 09:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]