Role of Intracellular Adhesion icaAD and agr genes in Biofilm Formation in Clinical S. aureus Isolates and Assessment of Two Phenotypic Methods.

Byline: Tayyeba Saba, Muhammad Sajid, Amir Afzal Khan and Rabaab Zahra

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the role of icaAD and agr genes in biofilm formation and evaluate the consistency of two phenotypic methods for biofilm measurement.

Methods: A total of 81 clinical S. aureus strains were included and analyzed for biofilm formation by two methods. The microtitration plate method was optimized using computational fluid dynamics and compared with the Congo red assay. The genes for icaAD and agr were detected using PCR.

Results: Of 81 isolates, biofilm production was detected in 43% isolates using Congo red method while microtiter plate assay showed biofilm production in 92% isolates. Both methods showed correlation in 30% isolates. PCR detection showed icaAD gene in 42 (52%) isolates. Out of 81 S. aureus isolates 65 strains (80%) contained agr while 16 (20%) strains were non-typeable.

Conclusions: In conclusion, biofilm production was observed for both agr positive and agr negative isolates. Furthermore, the presence of icaAD genes was not associated with all biofilm producing strains as some strains negative for icaAD genes displayed biofilm production.

KEYWORDS: agr, Biofilm, S. aures, Simulations.

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is an important human pathogen which causes both hospital and community acquired infections and under circumstances can be opportunistic pathogen. Severity of infections by S. aureus ranges from localized skin abscesses to life threatening diseases like osteomyelitis, arthritis, endocarditis and infections associated with colonization of medical devices like intravenous catheters and heart valves.1 Major reason for biomaterial associated infections is the formation of biofilm in which these organisms adhere to medical devices.2

Biofilm formation takes place in two steps: first microorganisms adhere to substrate surface and then cells stick to each other.3 Ica operon in S. aureus contains icaADBC genes which play an important role in biofilm formation.4 N-acetylglucosaminyl transferase enzyme is encoded by icaA gene and is responsible for polysaccharide intracellular adhesion (PIA) production, while icaD is involved in enhancing the activity of the enzyme for complete phenotypic expression of PIA.5 A number of infections are caused by biofilm forming S. aureus so it is important to have reliable method for the early detection of biofilm forming strains.6 Microtiter plate assay is considered as standard screening method for comparing adherence pattern and is most widely used quantitative method for detection of biofilm formation.7,8 Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have been used to optimize the suitable conditions to detect the biofilm formation by this method and have proven to be efficient.9,10

In S. aureus accessory gene regulator (agr) locus encodes the quorum sensing system which plays an important role in biofilm formation and has been shown to slow down biofilm formation.11,12 S. aureus strains having no agr group can form strong biofilm.12,13 When biofilm has formed activation of agr system is required for detachment of biofilm. In view of importance of infections associated with biofilm formation, the aim of this study was to determine biofilm producing ability of clinical Staphylococcus aureus and to evaluate reliability of phenotypic methods.

METHODS

Bacterial isolates: A total of 81 S. aureus strains collected from Pakistan Institute of Medical Science (PIMS), Islamabad were included in the study. All isolates were confirmed by Gram staining, growth on mannitol salt agar and biochemical tests such as catalase, coagulase and DNase tests. Susceptibility testing to cefoxitin was conducted by disk diffusion method following the guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2016.

Biofilm formation by Congo red agar (CRA) method: Congo red agar medium was prepared with 37 g/l of brain heart infusion broth (BHI), 10 g/l agar, 50 g/l sucrose and 0.8 g/l Congo red. Congo red stain solution was prepared and autoclaved separately from other medium constituents. Plates were inoculated with test organisms and incubated for 24 to 48hrs at 37AdegC. PIA positive strains produced black colonies while PIA negative strains produced red colonies.

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Simulations: The computational domain (6.6mm diameter and 11.6mm high cylindrical region that is filled with 200 uL of water) was modeled using the 'blockMesh' utility of the open source CFD Tool 'OpenFOAM'14 leading to a structured mesh of 25,000 hexahedra elements, with maximum aspect ratio, non-orthogonality and skewness of 3.49282, 31.909 and 2.00744 respectively (Fig.1). A finite volume method (FVM) discretization was coupled to a volume-of-fluid (VoF) approach to describe the air-water two phase flows using the parameter [alpha] to determine the fraction of liquid in each mesh element. The revolving motion of the orbital shaker was implemented using an accelerating reference frame by introducing a source term in the momentum equation to capture the effects of the well motion.

Biofilm formation by Microtiter plate (MTP) assay: Biofilm formation by S. aureus was determined using 96 well microtiter plate assays. Each strain was tested in triplicate. Plates were incubated for 48 hrs at 37OC in shaking incubator at 130 rpm. Then wells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution for 10 minutes. In order to remove adherent bacteria from the wells, 200ul of 30% acetic acid was added to each well. The contents of the wells were mixed and optical density of each well was measured at 590 nm which indicated biofilm production. For interpretation of results, the strains were divided into three categories; moderate biofilm producers, strong biofilm producers and weak/no biofilm producers.4

PCR Amplification and Detection of agr Groups and icaAD genes: For agr genes amplification, primers sequences were chosen from published sequences15 and PCR was performed as described previously.16 For icaAD genes PCR, the sequences and PCR conditions used were as already described.17 Amplified samples were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide.

RESULTS

Bacterial Isolates: A total of 81 clinical isolates were confirmed as S. aureus by using Gram staining and standard biochemical tests. All isolates were mannitol fermenters and positive for catalase, DNase and coagulase enzymes. Resistance to cefoxitin presented the prevalence of methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) to be 55%.

CFD Simulations: The numerical study of the micro-well indicated that the slope of the air/ water interface stabilized after initial period of sloshing. Greater slopes were observed at higher orbital frequencies, which were also characterized by recirculation zones near the interface leading to greater convective mixing. This hydrodynamic mixing is responsible for transporting nutrients to growing biofilm and therefore our simulations suggested the shaking conditions for a 50 mm orbital diameter shaker to be in the range of 120-150 rpm for improved biofilm growth.

Biofilm formation assessment by two phenotypic assays: Biofilm production was accessed by two phenotypic methods: CRA (qualitative) and MTP (quantitative). Using CRA, 35 (43%) strains were rendered biofilm producers as they formed black colonies while 46 (57%) were non-biofilm producers as they displayed red colonies. In MTP, biofilm formation was detected in 75 (92%) isolates. Based on biofilm intensity we observed that 68 (91%) were moderate producers, 7 (9.3%) were strong producers, while 7 (9.3%) were non biofilm producers. When observed for correlation between two methods, it was found in 33 (30.2%) isolates (Fig.2).

Association between icaAD genes, phenotypic assays and agr Specific Groups: The icaAD genes were detected in 42 isolates (Fig.3). When correlated the phenotypic biofilm production with icaAD gene presence, of 42 icaAD gene positive isolates, 26 were positive by CRA and 40 were positive by MTP. When compared the result of MTP with agr genes detection, out of 65 (80%) agr positive isolates, 60 isolates were biofilm producers among which 58 (89%) were moderate or weak biofilm producers, 2 (3%) were strong biofilm producers while 5 (8%) were non-biofilm forming. Out of 16 (20%) agr negative isolates, biofilm production was detected in 14 isolates where 5 (31%) were strong biofilm forming, 8 (50%) were moderate biofilm forming while in 3 (19%) isolates no biofilm formation was observed.

DISCUSSION

In our study of 81 clinical S. aureus isolates, biofilm production was detected in 75 (92%) strains with different intensities by MTP method. Previous studies have indicated that there is only small portion of S. aureus clinical isolates that form biofilm while few studies reported that all S. aureus strains tested were positive for biofilm formation.2,18 One study demonstrated that 78% of S. aureus were biofilm positive19, while another showed that 83.3% of S. aureus were biofilm producers.8 In an earlier study, biofilm-positive phenotype was exhibited by 57.8% of Staphylococcal clinical isolates and high and moderate biofilm formation was displayed by 14.47% and 39.4% strains, respectively while weak or no biofilm was detected in 46% isolates.7 In this study, using CRA method, 43% Staphylococcus aureus isolates were regarded as biofilm positive which is in agreement with other studies.20,21

The correlation between MTP and CRA was observed in 30% isolates. One study has shown low correspondence between both methods where correlation between both methods was only in 5.2% S. aureus isolates.7 In comparison, an earlier study showed better correlation where S. aureus positive by CRA method were also positive by MTP assay.22 CRA method is taken as an alternative method for screening biofilm forming S. aureus isolates because it is less time consuming, and easy to perform.2 However, our findings agree with another study that for detection of biofilm formation by S. aureus CRA alone should not be relied upon.7 Several studies have shown that biofilm associated infections in Staphylococcus aureus are due to presence of both icaA and icaD genes.5,8,20

We detected icaA and icaD genes in 42 isolates which is in agreement with studies reported in the literature.18 In one study icaA and icaD gene was present in 42.2% Staphylococcus aureus isolates.20 S. aureus isolates screened in prosthetic joint and would infections were positive for icaA gene.3,18 Another study demonstrated that out of 65 S. aureus isolates, 64 were positive for icaA and icaD genes while only one strain containing ica gene was found to be biofilm negative by CRA method.20 Similarly 54% and 52% icaA and icaD positive strains were also biofilm forming by CRA method.3 While comparing result of icaAD gene detection with MTP assay for biofilm production, 40 isolates positive for icaAD genes were also positive by MTP method which is in agreement with previous report.8 It was reported that 83.3% of ica-positive Staphylococcus isolates produced biofilm by MTP assay.22

Our findings suggest that PIA independent biofilm formation takes place in S. aureus which agrees with another report.23 icaADBC expression and PIA synthesis takes place in later stages of infection even though when microorganisms have organized in a biofilm which means that an alternative mechanism exists. A study has demonstrated that one coagulase negative Staphylococcus strongly adherent by MTP assay was ica negative.6 These results can be explained by the observation there are other genes such as accumulation associated protein (aap) and Bap homolog protein (bhp) that are also involved in biofilm formation.24 These genes were found to induce biofilm formation in PIA independent manner however, another group has reported two biofilm forming strains having neither ica genes nor aap or bhp genes suggesting novel mechanism of biofilm formation in these strains.25 Inter cellular signaling in bacteria is described by quorum sensing which also affects biofilm formation.

In this study, the moderate/weak biofilm formation was observed in both agr negative and positive strains which indicate that agr has a mixed role in biofilm formation and perhaps the intensity of biofilm formation depends on the extent of expression of agr genes. We found that out of 65 agr positive strains, only 3% were strong biofilm producers, while in 16 agr negative strains 31% were strong biofilm producers which shows that low/negative agr enhances the biofilm formation. This is also in accordance with the report where 78% agr negative while only 6% agr positive strains made biofilm.12 This suggests that to treat persistent or device related S. aureus infections the quorum sensing can be a target and the strategies should be to enhance the agr system. Furthermore, biofilm formation in vitro does not correlate fully with the presence of icaAD gene, and ica independent biofilm formation highlights importance of further genetic investigations.

Source of funding: Higher Education Commission, Pakistan.

Declaration of interest: Nothing to declare

REFERENCES

1. Dinges MM, Orwin PM, Schlievert PM. Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(1):16-34.

2. Knobloch JK, Horstkotte MA, Rohde H, Mack D. Evaluation of different detection methods of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2002;191(2):101-106. doi: 10.1007/s00430-002-0124-3.

3. Yazdani R, Oshaghi M, Havayi A, Pishva E, Salehi R, Sadeghizadeh M, et al. Detection of icaAD Gene and Biofilm Formation in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Wound Infections. Iranian J Publ Health. 2006;35(2):25-28.

4. Nasr RA, Abu Shady HM, Hussein HS. Biofilm formation and presence of icaAD gene in clinical isolates of staphylococci. Egypt J Med Hum Genet. 2012;3(13):269-274.

5. Arciola CR, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(6):2151-2156. doi: 10.1128/ JCM.39.6.2151-2156.2001.

6. Oliveira A, Cunha Mde L. Comparison of methods for the detection of biofilm production in coagulasenegative staphylococci. BMC Res Notes. 2010;3:260. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-260.

7. Mathur T, Singhal S, Khan S, Upadhyay DJ, Fatma T, Rattan A. Detection of biofilm formation among the clinical isolates of Staphylococci: an evaluation of three different screening methods. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2006;24(1):25-29.

8. Gad GF, El-Feky MA, El-Rehewy MS, Hassan MA, Abolella H, El-Baky RM. Detection of icaA, icaD genes and biofilm production by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from urinary tract catheterized patients. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009;3(5):342-351.

9. Gomes LC, Moreira JM, Simoes M, Melo LF, Mergulhao FJ. Biofilm localization in the vertical wall of shaking 96-well plates. Scientifica. 2014;2014:231083. doi: 10.1155/2014/231083.

10. Gomes LC, Silva LN, Simoes M, Melo LF, Mergulhao FJ. Escherichia coli adhesion, biofilm development and antibiotic susceptibility on biomedical materials. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015;103(4):1414-1423. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35277.

11. Beenken KE, Blevins JS, Smeltzer MS. Mutation of sarA in Staphylococcus aureus limits biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2003;71(7):4206-4211.

12. Vuong C, Saenz HL, Gotz F, Otto M. Impact of the agr quorum-sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(6):1688-1693. doi: 10.1086/317606.

13. Ji G, Beavis R, Novick RP. Bacterial interference caused by autoinducing peptide variants. Science. 1997;276(5321):2027-2030.

14. Jasak H. OpenFOAM: Open source CFD in research and industry. Int J Nav Arch Ocean. 2009;1(2):89-94. doi: 10.3744/Jnaoe.2009.1.2.089.

15. Shopsin B, Mathema B, Alcabes P, Said-Salim B, Lina G, Matsuka A, et al. Prevalence of agr specificity groups among Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing children and their guardians. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(1):456-569. doi: 10.1128/Jcm.41.1.456-459.2003.

16. Khan S, Rasheed F, Zahra R. Genetic Polymorphism of agr Locus and Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus at two hospitals in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(1):172-176. doi: 10.12669/pjms.301.4124.

17. Mariana NS, Salman SA, Neela V, Zamberi, S. Evaluation of modified Congo red agar for detection of biofilm produced by clinical isolates of methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus. Afr J Microbiol. 2009;3:330-338.

18. Fowler VG Jr., Fey PD, Reller LB, Chamis AL, Corey GR, Rupp ME. The intercellular adhesin locus ica is present in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from bacteremic patients with infected and uninfected prosthetic joints. Med Microbiol Immunol. 2001;189(3):127-131.

19. Jain A, Agarwal A. Biofilm production, a marker of pathogenic potential of colonizing and commensal staphylococci. J Microbiol Methods. 2009;76(1):88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.09.017.

20. Satorres SE, Alcaraz LE. Prevalence of icaA and icaD genes in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from patients and hospital staff. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2007;15(2):87-90.

21. Arslan S, Ozkardes F. Slime production and antibiotic susceptibility in staphylococci isolated from clinical samples. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102(1):29-33. doi: S0074-02762007000100004.

22. Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Santagati M, Campanile F, Amicosante G, Perilli MG, et al. Presence of the ica operon in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis and its role in biofilm production. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10(12):1081-1088. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01024.

23. Shanks RM, Donegan NP, Graber ML, Buckingham SE, Zegans ME, Cheung AL, et al. Heparin stimulates Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 2005;73(8):4596-4606. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.8.4596-4606.2005.

24. Tormo M, Knecht E, Gotz F, Lasa I, Penades JR. Bap-dependent biofilm formation by pathogenic species of Staphylococcus: evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Microbiology. 2005;151(Pt 7):2465-2475. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27865-0.

25. Qin Z, Yang X, Yang L, Jiang J, Ou Y, Molin S, et al. Formation and properties of in vitro biofilms of ica-negative Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56(Pt 1):83-93. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46799-0.

Article Details

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:	Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Geographic Code:	6ZAIR
Date:	Jun 30, 2018
Words:	3059
Previous Article:	Transurethral balloon dilatation of the Prostate and Transurethral Plasmakinetic resection of the Prostate in the treatment of Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Next Article:	Screening Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with High Depression Scores.
Topics:	Genes Methods Genetic research Methods Staphylococcus aureus Methods