Topic on Template talk:Video

I propose a new row for `|no motion blur =` or something along those lines, since the ability to remove motion blur has been a make or break for many potential game buyers for some years now (The controversies around Crash Bandicoot PC games were plentiful and with high temperature due to this).

In the example below, "always on" would mean there's no motion blur to begin with, "true" would mean there's settings to turn motion blur off, "false" would mean the motion blur cannot be turned off, and "hackable" would mean there's quirky ways to force the removal of motion blur.

<!-- No motion blur -->
{{#ifeq: {{{no motion blur|}}}{{{no motion blue notes|}}} | unknown ||
	<tr class="template-infotable-body table-settings-video-body-row">
		<th scope="row" class="table-settings-video-body-parameter">No motion blur<abbr>Whether motion blur can be turned off completely.</abbr></th>
		<td class="table-settings-video-body-rating">{{Tickcross|{{{no motion blur|}}}||{{{no motion blur notes|}}}}}</td>
		<td colspan="2" class="table-settings-video-body-notes">{{{no motion blur notes|}}}</td>
	</tr>
}}

This is a requested edit. This notice will be removed when resolved.

I understand why you would prefer a negative statement/feature, as it allows "always on" to be the "best" from the perspective of a user who dislike motion blur, though it would go against all other existing rows we have, so I don't think that's a good idea.

I've sadly forgotten the details but I believe a motion blur row have been discussed in the past but dismissed for various reasons.

I agree with Aemony that if we had a row about motion blur, it should be the affirmative "motion blur" instead of the negative "motion blur" to avoid confusion.

Mouse acceleration is generally seen as undesirable, but we still list that as the affirmative "mouse acceleration", not "no mouse acceleration".