Paul Bryant's Reviews > Nuclear War: A Scenario

Nuclear War by Annie Jacobsen
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
416390
's review

liked it
bookshelves: modern-life, politics

The survivors will envy the dead.

- Nikita Khrushchev

This book is terrifying and tedious at the same time. In fact, I might say it’s borderline unreadable – not because of the ghastly scenario it spells out but because of the horrible uncontrolled gushings of military acronyms falling like fallout on each and every page

SIOP
NORTHCOM
STRATCOM
SBIRS
FEMA
COOP
SLBM
The Football
The Black Book
SecDef
KNEECAP

And so on, but also because of the inevitable GIGANTISM of everything being described here : because everything concerning nuclear war is extreme ! The power of the bombs, the vastnesses of the military bases, the complexities of the delivery systems, the silos, the subs, the casualties, the deaths, the deaths. I must say that Annie Jacobsen appears to be obsessed with the size of everything :

The Ivy Mike prototype bomb weighed around 80 tons (160,000 pounds), an instrument of destruction itself so physically enormous it had to be constructed inside a corrugated aluminium building eighty-eight feet long and forty-six feet wide.

The underground Battle Deck, a 1000 square foot, concrete-walled room

Some 720 million gallons of sewer-infested waters flooding the base, ruining 137 buildings and destroying 1 million square feet of workspace, including 118,000 square feet of Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility space (also known as SCIF space)

With its 16 petaflops of speed and 236 petabytes of storage capacity

This one-of-a-kind, stadium-sized, seagoing, self-propelled radar station weighs 50,000 tons, requires 1.9 million gallons of gas to run, can withstand 30-foot-tall waves, is larger than a football field, requires 86 crew members


CUT TO THE CHASE! WHAT HAPPENS ?

Annie imagines the following possibility :

1. North Korea fires a missile towards the USA, targeted on the Pentagon. This is spotted quickly but the Americans can’t tell what’s in the warhead – could be a dummy, could be biological or nuclear weapon. Might have been fired accidentally. The Americans try to shoot it down and don’t succeed, because, as the quote on p 73 says, it’s “akin to shooting a bullet with a bullet”. But I did not really understand this bit – as luck would have it, I’m writing this on 14 April 2024. Overnight, Iran sent around 300 drones and missiles towards Israel, and “almost all” of them were intercepted and shot down. Probably it’s because drones are easier to hit because they’re slower than an ICBM? But also they’re smaller! So I don’t know.

2. 17 minutes later, a second missile, fired from a Korean submarine off the coast of California, aimed at the Diablo Canyon Power Plant, a nuclear plant. This second one detonates first.

3. Americans retaliate with 50 missiles aimed at N Korea. Because of limitations of range, these missiles have to go over the North Pole. Because of the known inadequacies of the Russian detection system (Tundra) they can’t tell the destination of over-the-pole missiles, so they could easily think it was Russia under attack, and that is what happens in this scenario. Because of the chaos of the NK attack, the Americans have not been able to get in touch with the Russian president. The whole thing from beginning to end has only taken 34 minutes.

4. The first missile hits the Pentagon; Washington DC is eliminated from American geography.

5. After that, things go downhill rapidly.

THE FOURTH WORLD WAR

Everybody knows it will be fought with bows and arrows, in about ten thousand years from now. The first chapters of Annie Jacobsen’s horrifying book are the best, dealing with the way the American military has successively considered the way a nuclear war should be conducted, exactly how many millions would die, how many cities should be deemed expendable and so forth. Because they were “governed by disciplined, meticulous and energetically mindless groupthink” they just got on with the assigned task, they never refused to contemplate the uncontemplatable. Everybody should read this part. This is where we are right now, flinging lighted matches around in a leaking gasoline storage depot.

The worst part of Annie’s book, which I would be most surprised if she doesn’t now regret, is the reason for the initial North Korean missile strike. Kim Jong Un, it seems, harboured a very deep grudge about photos released by Western sources showing satellite images of the Korean peninsula at night. The south was awash with bright electric light, the north was dark, and North Korea was ridiculed as “electricity poor”. To a mad king, this comparing image was like a poke in the eye…. What happens next is revenge for that insult.

Really, this is very bad! I hope no copies of this book end up in Pyongyang.
56 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Nuclear War.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

March 27, 2024 – Shelved as: to-read-nonfiction
March 27, 2024 – Shelved
April 12, 2024 – Started Reading
April 14, 2024 – Shelved as: modern-life
April 14, 2024 – Shelved as: politics
April 14, 2024 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-16 of 16 (16 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Davy (new)

Davy Bennett Is this a newer book?


Paul Bryant it was published on 26 March this year.


Lisa I’m on a waitlist for this book ever since I listened to a Science Friday interview. Thanks for the review!


Paul Bryant I'm thinking I should have added a spoiler alert, even though it's non fiction....


message 5: by Brad (new)

Brad Lyerla Thanks for the review, Paul. I might not read it, but I like knowing about Nuclear War, a scenario.


message 6: by Cecily (new)

Cecily I didn't know that Khrushchev quote, but I believe the truth of it and means I have to suspend a good deal of belief to watch post-apocalyptic films!


Paul Bryant did you ever see that British movie Threads ? From 1984. The most realistic and frightening one I think.


message 8: by Cecily (new)

Cecily No, but I just looked it up: grimly plausible, judging by the trailers etc.


message 9: by The Bauchler (new)

The Bauchler I have this as an audiobook and have made a couple of starts at reading it, but I end up shelving it for something lighter.

For me 'The War Game' was most chilling representation of 'the bomb'. It was (and still is) an incredible piece of cinema. Aunty Beeb decided it shouldn't be shown, but 10 years after it was made, our unusually liberal headmaster let us early teens see it in a school assembly and it left a terror of M.A.D. that is still with me to this day. Bobbies shooting looters and the terminally injured. Eye-opening stuff.


message 10: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant Yes! The War Game is brilliant, second best nuclear war movie after Threads. It's a must see for anyone wanting to be terrified.


message 11: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Willis I thought Threads was terrifying! I'll have to see if I can track down The War Game.


message 12: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant The War Game can be found on a website called docsonline


message 13: by Rachel (new)

Rachel Willis Paul wrote: "The War Game can be found on a website called docsonline" Awesome - thank you!


message 14: by Randy (new)

Randy Rhody "This is where we are right now, flinging lighted matches around in a leaking gasoline storage depot." We live in "interesting times."


message 15: by Dolors (new)

Dolors Terrifying indeed. Coincidentally, I just recently watched Nolan's latest film "Oppenheimer" and I can relate to several of the things you enumerate in your review. Terrifying, indeed.


message 16: by Theo (new) - added it

Theo W Excellent summation and commentary. Thank you. Admittedly, I have not read the book. However, many of these scenarios I've already heard from past analyst or experts. Thus, It is odd to me that this book is described as non-fiction when in fact it has not yet occurred. As you indicated deterrence & diplomacy have worked. With both vigor and integrity we have to continually pursue those ends. As a final note, Annie leaves no room for probability. Not all ICBM's are going to hit their target - there will be failures. Perhaps, though, that is of no great consolation. Shalom, Theodore.


back to top