Will Byrnes's Reviews > Cosmogenesis: An Unveiling of the Expanding Universe

Cosmogenesis by Brian Thomas Swimme
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
1526851
…it feels today that we are in the middle of a profound transformation of humanity.
--------------------------------------
We don’t live in a cosmos. We live in a cosmogenesis, a universe that is becoming, a universe that established its order in each era and then transcends that order to establish a new order.
Cosmos - The universe seen as a well-ordered whole; from the Greek word kosmos ‘order, ornament, world, or universe’, so called by Pythagoras or his disciples from their view of its perfect order and arrangement. – from Oxford reference

Genesis - Hebrew Bereshit (“In the Beginning”), the first book of the Bible. Its name derives from the opening words: “In the beginning….” Genesis narrates the primeval history of the world - from the Encyclopedia Britannica

description
Brian Thomas Swimme - image from Journey of the Universe

So, Cosmogenesis means, at its root, the beginning of everything. Diverse cultures have come up with diverse understandings of how everything came to be. Where Swimme differs is in seeing the genesis, the beginning, the creation of everything as an ongoing process, not a one-off in deep history.

Cosmogenesis tracks Swimme’s journey from math professor to spokesman for a movement that seeks to rejoin science and spirituality. The stations along this route, which runs from 1968 to 1983, consist of people he considers great minds. He gushes like a Swiftie with closeup tickets to an Eras Tour show over several of these genius-level individuals, while relying on his analytical capacity to note shortcomings in some of the theories some others propose. Swimme mixes his approach a bit. It is in large measure a memoir, with a focus on his intellectual (and spiritual) growth, along with descripti0ns of the places where he lived, taught, and studied, and the people who inspired him, providing some background to the theories and ovbservations to which he is exposed.

A mathematics PhD, with a long and diverse teaching history, he grounds his work in the scientific. But he does not separate the scientific from the spiritual, from the human. In his view, we are all a part of the ongoing evolution of everything, noting that every subatomic part that make up every atom in our bodies, in our world, was present at the Biggest Bang, then was further refined by the lesser bangs of supernovas manufacturing what became our constituent parts. Even today, we bathe, wallow, bask, and breathe in radiation from that original event. It may have occurred fourteen billion years ago, but in a measurable way it is happening still. And we all remain a part of it.

There is a piece of Swimme’s material-cum-spiritual notion that I found very appealing. I have experienced an ecstatic state while perceiving beauty in the world. On telling my son about one such, I remarked that it was like a religious experience. He answered, “why like?” Swimme recruits like experiences to bolster the connection between the humanly internal and the eternal of the cosmos.

Bear in mind that Swimme grew up in a Catholic tradition, which clearly impressed him. There is a strong incense scent of religiosity to his work. Not saying that Cosmogenesis is a religion, but I am not entirely certain it is not.
As a child I had learned that the Mass was where the sacred lived.
I had a very different response to the religious world to which I was exposed as a child through twelve years of Catholic education. There was no connection for me between the Mass and the sacred, whatever that was. Mass represented mostly a burden, a mandatory exercise, communicating nothing about layers of experience beyond the material, while offering hard evidence of the power of institutions to control how I spent my time. I did not, at the time, understand the community building and reinforcing aspect to this weekly tribal ritual, separate from the religious content.

I believe that what we think of as spiritual or spectral is the reality that lies beyond our perceptual bandwidth. The ancients did not understand lightning, so imagined a god hurling bolts. With scientific understanding of lightning, Zeus is cast from an imagined home on Mount Olympus to the confines of cultural history. Science expands our effective, if not necessarily our physical, biological bandwidth, and thus captures, making understandable, realities once thought the domain of imagined gods. But what of feeling? The ecstatic state I experience when witnessing the beauty of the world, is that a purely biological state, comprised of hormones and DNA? Or do we assign to that feeling, which can be difficult to explain, a higher meaning because of our inability to define it precisely enough? And, in doing so, are we not following in the path of the ancient Greeks who assigned to extra-human beings responsibility for natural events? So, I am not sure I am buying in to Swimme’s views.

It is, though, something, to pique the interest of people like myself who have rejected most forms of organized religion, particularly those that focus on a human-like all-powerful being, (see George Carlin’s routine re this. I’m with George.) but who hold open a lane for a greater, a different understanding of all reality. Where is the line between the material and the spiritual? How did we come to be here? Evolution provides plenty to explain that. But we still get back to a linear understanding of time as an impasse. If the (our) universe began with the big bang, then what came before? Einstein showed with his special theory of relativity that time is not so fixed a concept as we’d thought. Things operate at different speeds, relative to each other, depending on distance and speed. Who is to say that there might not be more fungability to our understanding of time, maybe even radically so? In a way, this is what Swimme is on about, ways of looking at our broader reality, at our origins and ongoing evolution, (not just the evolution of our species, but of the universe itself) through other, more experiential perspectives, (a new Gnosticism?) while still including science.
Humans have expressed their faith in a great variety of symbols, many of which have inspired me at one time or another. But today, if you ask for the foundation of my faith, I would say the stone cliffs of the Hudson River Palisades.
Overall I found this book brain candy of the first order. Take it as a survey-course primer for the theory he propounds. There are many videos available on-line for those interested in going beyond Cosmo 101. So, Is cosmogenesis one of the ten greatest ideas in human history as is claimed here? That is above my pay grade. Some of the notions presented here seemed a bit much, but there was enough that was worth considering that made this a satisfying, intriguing read. Suffice it to say that it is a fascinating take on, well, everything, and can be counted on to give your gray cells, comprised of materials that have been around for 14 billion years, a hearty jiggle at the very least.
Everything is up in the air. We are living in a deranged world where nihilism dominates every major state. The contest today is for the next world philosophy.

Review posted – January 13, 2023

Publication dates
----------Hardcover - November 15, 2022
----------Trade paperback - December 12, 2023

I received a hardcover of Cosmogenesis from Counterpoint in return for a fair review.



This review has been cross-posted on my site, Coot’s Reviews. Stop by and say Hi!

=============================EXTRA STUFF

Links to the author’s personal, FB, and Twitter pages

Twitter and Facebook do not appear to have ever been used you might also try

Interviews
-----Deeptime Network - Brian Swimme -- What's Next? Planetary Mind and the Future - video – 1:12:41 – from 6:50
-----Sue Speaks - SUE Speaks Podcast: Searching for Unity in Everything - podcast - 31:27

Items of Interest from the author
----- The Third Story of the Universe
-----A Great Leap in Being - 28:56
-----Human Energy - Introduction to the Noosphere: The Planetary Minds
-----Journey of the Universe

Items of Interest
-----San Francisco Chronicle - Science doesn’t cover it all, author Brian Thomas Swimme explains
-----
George Carlin on religion
136 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read Cosmogenesis.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

Started Reading
January 8, 2023 – Finished Reading
January 10, 2023 – Shelved
January 10, 2023 – Shelved as: brain-candy
January 10, 2023 – Shelved as: evolution
January 10, 2023 – Shelved as: memoir
January 10, 2023 – Shelved as: natural-history
January 10, 2023 – Shelved as: philosophy
January 10, 2023 – Shelved as: religion-and-sprituality
January 10, 2023 – Shelved as: religion
January 10, 2023 – Shelved as: science
January 10, 2023 – Shelved as: nonfiction
January 13, 2023 – Shelved as: 2023-nonfiction-reader-challenge

Comments Showing 1-20 of 20 (20 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Dee (new) - added it

Dee A very fascinating review will! Its good to give the grey cells a good jiggle now and again lol. Thanks for all the extra links! Its great to go down a universal worm hole👍


message 2: by Steelwhisper (new)

Steelwhisper Great review!

What I am trying to wrap my brain around is the apparent need some people have for a religion. Does he address that in any way?


message 3: by Roy (new) - added it

Roy God, Will! You write the best reviews. Are you a professional reviewer? How much time do you spend on a review? They are so detailed, I wish I could write reviews like you do. I'm embarrassed by my feeble attempts at reviewing. Every time I post one, I promise myself I'll do better next time. I never do. Well, anyway, keep up the good work. Ciao.


Will Byrnes Dee wrote: "A very fascinating review will! Its good to give the grey cells a good jiggle now and again lol. Thanks for all the extra links! Its great to go down a universal worm hole👍"

Thanks, Dee. Plenty of wormholes with this one.


Will Byrnes Steelwhisper wrote: "Great review!

What I am trying to wrap my brain around is the apparent need some people have for a religion. Does he address that in any way?"


Thank you, SW.

That apparent need is rather global, as 84% of the world's population identify as religious to one extent or another.

I do not recall Swimme addressing this need, but it is possible that it is there and I missed it.


Will Byrnes Roy wrote: "God, Will! You write the best reviews. Are you a professional reviewer? How much time do you spend on a review? They are so detailed, I wish I could write reviews like you do. I'm embarrassed by my..."

Grazie, Roy. Nice to be thought of as a pro, but nope, pure amateur here. Generally, I produce one new review a week, but that rate has taken a major hit of late, due to an increase in external demands on my time, so the one-a-week rate has been reduced from actual to aspirational for the moment. The entire process of producing these things is considerable. I would be happy to go over my system with you if you like. Let me know.

As for embarrassment, we all have our things. I always sucked at basketball, for example, despite being tall, and expected to excel. Coerced as a teen into signing up for my high school b-ball team, I succeeded in proving my incapacity, to my enduring mortification. I suppose I might have improved with A LOT OF extra practice and training, but there were other things that were more important. No one is good at everything, but we can usually improve somewhat with extra practice and learning or training.


message 7: by Steelwhisper (new)

Steelwhisper Will wrote: "That apparent need is rather global, as 84% of the world's population identify as religious to one extent or another..."

That's where my problem in understanding comes from. Where I live, we have barely 40% (the more accurate number is probably 30-35%) people who identify as religious and people are leaving the churches in droves. Commonly cosmologists here are as far removed from religion as please. So consider me fascinated. Again, thank you for bringing this up :-)


message 8: by Peter (new)

Peter Upton Excellent review Will, but does this book dwell at all on what was before the Big Bang? So many books start at this point but there must have been something being compressed to the point of the Bang. Not being a scientist I have always suspected a Black Hole compressing material to the point of explosion. Also Einstein pointed out that time only began with the Big Bang and that it is a part of the material world. So when we die we escape time the laws of time and enter everlasting life. There are many books that record Near Death Experiences, Outer Body Experiences and Communication through Mediums from allegedly dead People to show that our consciousness doesn't depend on our material body to survive, it is just the appropriate vehicle to move around in this material, gravity laden world.


Will Byrnes Thanks, Peter. Swimme is specific in considering only from the point of the Big Bang, as that is all that is (currently) subject to available scientific measurement.

I would be a lot more comfortable with the persistence of consciousness beyond death if there were more reproducible scientific studies confirming it.

Who knows what new tricks science might learn, and how much it might expand out effective bandwidth? I retain hope that some lowly lab assistant or garage inventor might someday come up with a way to measure things that we currently cannot track.


message 10: by Peter (new)

Peter Upton That's the trouble with the scientific approach it ignores all evidence that can't be scientifically proven even though there are books full of true accounts. What I really find amazing is that despite that attitude they are using quantum physics when they still can't explain the results of the split screen experiment from about 100 years ago. They seem to have just decided as a group to ignore it as inexplicable and carry on regardless.


message 11: by Roy (new) - added it

Roy Will wrote: "Roy wrote: "God, Will! You write the best reviews. Are you a professional reviewer? How much time do you spend on a review? They are so detailed, I wish I could write reviews like you do. I'm embar..."

Thanks for the kind offer, Will. I'm not ready to dive into anything complicated right now. But I will keep you in mind for any future projects though. Regards, Roy.


message 12: by Jodi (new)

Jodi Incredibly interesting stuff, and a really terrific review, Will!!


message 13: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Thanks, Jodi. Uber big picture stuff being addressed here, interesting indeed.


message 14: by Jodi (last edited Jan 15, 2023 01:22PM) (new)

Jodi You're so right, Will! I don't think anyone could discuss anything much bigger than this!😊


message 15: by Hanneke (new)

Hanneke Fascinating review, Will! I immediately believe you when you said it is brain candy of the first order. Thanks, that was a really interesting review!


message 16: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Thanks, H. Definitely an intriguing read.


message 17: by Janet (new)

Janet Roger I love your review Will.


message 18: by Will (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Thanks, Janet. Some reviews are more stimulating, more fun to write.


message 19: by Kate (new)

Kate Thank you Will for your enlightening review. I was captivated by your Extraordinary attention to detail, a fascinating read. What struck me the most, was how the sciences and spiritual complexities try and help us understand the immense essence of the world around us. Robin Wall Kimmerer’s ‘Braiding Sweetgrass,’ words resonate from Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge, and teaching of plants is eloquently explored.Highly recommended.


message 20: by Will (last edited Jan 13, 2024 12:05AM) (new) - rated it 4 stars

Will Byrnes Thank you, Kate. I added the Kimmerer book to my immense TBR.


back to top