Paul Bryant's Reviews > The Confessions of Victor X

The Confessions of Victor X by Anonymous
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
416390
's review

liked it
bookshelves: verysleazyfun, memoirs

This is a very dodgy document. The first sentence is :

These are the sexual confessions of a southern Russian born about 1870, of good family, educated and capable, like many Russians, of psychological analysis; he prepared this confession in French in 1912.

Victor X is referring to himself in the third person here, by the way. It confused me at first. Anyway, the story is that the famous sex researcher Havelock Ellis was preparing yet another volume of his Studies in the Psychology of Sex, and Victor wrote his confession for possible inclusion, as a case history. Mr Ellis' American editors told him not to publish it, in no uncertain terms. But the French edition's editors had no such qualms – mais naturellement – so it went in as a hardly-ever-read appendix, to be finally rendered into English in 1980 by Donald Rayfield, professor of Russian at the University of London. The professor stumbled over these confessions in the British Library in London and his brain exploded and he " translated them on the spot".
So what's the big deal here?

Well, in the first 84 pages , Victor describes his early life around Kiev, Ukraine, between the ages of 3 and 19. So now imagine if you will an entire country where parents just don't care what their kids do. They're just not interested. As long as you don't cavort naked on the breakfast table, you can do what you please with whom. What about all the illegitimate babies which will inevitably result? Pshaw, in Russia these things are no problem – they do not go in for this Catholic guilt trip the rest of Europe likes to wallow in. Victor's family knows a woman who's had four children with four different men and is still unmarried. It is no problem. She is not shunned, she's just a little different than most. No problem. Another vodka. Thank you, yes please.

So Victor meets shagadelic babe after shagadelic babe and by the age of 19 there is little he hasn't done at least twice. Typical Victor description:

They were strong females, marvellously strapping, and exuded health and animal vitality. They had red cheeks, enormous behinds, firm jutting breasts, legs like Doric columns, muscular, powerful vulvas.

Powerful what??

So then, age 19, Victor goes to University in Milan, and the shutters – bang! – come dowm. No more rumpy pumpy for Victor.

From the moment I left Kiev I lived a life of abstinence. I still felt erotic urges but unlike what I expected, I could find no way of satisfying them… Generally, young girls are not so free to move about in Italy as in Russia; they only go out in their mother's company and never entertain gentlemen alone… I could pursue a girl only if I had "honourable intentions"…"And people say the Italians are so passionate!" I said to myself with astonishment

That being the case one may have thought Victor would have recourse to prostitutes but he was very afraid of venereal disease, and he didn't have the cash needed to keep a mistress, so he switched from promiscuity to celibacy.

I lived in absolute chastity from twenty to thirty-two. At first I found absitnence a burden; afterwards I got used to it and thought no more of women. My eleven years of chastity were the happiest, or rather the least unhappy, of my life.

Then things took a turn for the worse. He met a nice young lady of 27 and intended to marry her, and they were engaged. Now working as an engineer, he gets sent to Naples. Which, it turns out, was one giant brothel.

Families who are not badly off…traffic in their prepubescent girls…The Neapolotans are a very practical lot indeed : they make their money every way they can except by working.

A pimp offers him two girls, aged 15 and 11, at the same time. He's introduced to the girls' mother who agrees the price. He tells himself these girls have already been thoroughly corrupted. Two pages of description follows. Then he gets the taste for little girls.

I soon got to know other "honourable" families with little girls of ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen who were likewise virgins and as expert as the first two

The deal was that these children would do anything you like which didn't require penetration. You could (of course) buy their virginities but the price was sky high. In time he starts up with an adult prostitute, she gives him gonorrhoea, he has to keep putting off his marriage because of that, and his fiancee runs out of patience and dumps him. But alas, the sexual obsession with very young girls does not leave him. He moves to Spain, there are no further paedophilic episodes, he becomes a voyeur, just another dirty old man.

One may be forgiven in wondering if Victor was just making all this stuff up. Professor Rayfield did his homework and figured out who Victor was, and so verified at least the verifiable in his confession – that he did live here and there, and he did study at the University of Turin, not Milan, etc. Long story short, the professor believes Victor.

Vladimir Nobokov published Conclusive Evidence, his memoir, in 1951, and refers to Victor's confessions ruefully :

Our innocence now seems almost monstrous to me, in the light of various confessions for those years cited by Havelock Ellis… from [the Ukraine] there comes a particularly Babylonian contribution

Professor Rayfield discusses VN's story The Magician and comments

Victor's confessions provided the final push in the birth of Lolita's central theme

I can't say I'm convinced by this, but I'll give Prof Rayfield his say – admitting Victor's complete lack of any sense of humour or
irony, yet he finds similarities between Victor and Humbert Humbert :

The immense culture and the exhibitionist pedantry, the fastidiousness and snobbery, the inability to align himself with any nationality – a fatal cosmopolitalism… an ability to watch himself in action, to record the minutest detail and to savour and dwell on until the recollection becomes more exciting than the act… Victor writing for Havelock Ellis, like Humbert Humbert writing for the gentlemen of the jury, relishes his superior intelligence, his self-assurance that what he has to tell his audience will surpass anything in their experience and leave them dumbfounded.


Yes, that I agree with. This book left me dumbfounded.
7 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Confessions of Victor X.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

April 19, 2012 – Started Reading
April 19, 2012 – Shelved
April 21, 2012 – Shelved as: verysleazyfun
April 21, 2012 – Finished Reading
May 16, 2018 – Shelved as: memoirs

Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye It's interesting how this work and the fictional Humbert Humbert both seek legitimacy for their confessions, the one by writing for inclusion in a scientific study, the other by writing a confession ostensibly for production to the jury in his trial.

In the early days of pornographic publishing, the porn was surrounded by essays and other boring stuff, so that the complete work would qualify for an artistic or scientific merit defence.

Still, if this book is true, the issue is not so much that Victor X wrote about it, but that he lived and did it, and I'm sure he wasn't alone.

Rayfield's quote is revealing, especially what it reveals about the holier than thou self-perception, but that's typical of someone who says it's (anything's) OK as long as I don't get caught.

Do you feel that this was an upper class trait? That it's OK if you're "U" (in the Mitford sense)?


Paul Bryant I'm very much a non-U class warrior as I think you know... there's a whole class war thing going on in the famous sexual confessions of old - Casanova, De sade, Secret Life of Walter, and so on. The large number of "conquests" in those volumes appear to me to be mostly a series of rapes committed by upper middle or aristocratic men on working class women who were in no position to refuse them. Victor X is not like those if you take him as trustworthy, which is always a good question. He would have you believe that all of Ukraine was rocking and rolling lustily, and no coercion was involved. But yes, he was an upper-middle class guy and his partners were working class girls in the main, as per usual.

However, I think you're asking , perhaps, if paedophilia as such is an upper class trait? If that's the question, then I don't think so.


message 3: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye No, I wasn't asking the latter question, though I was tempted to raise the issue of aesthetics being behind paedophilia, whatever your class.

The comments about pedantry, fastidiousness, cosmopolitanism were so loaded, with what, I don't know.

Your first paragraph all makes sense, though I wonder whether upper class men also preyed on upper or middle class girls, e.g., were there other power relationships at play?


message 4: by Paul (last edited Apr 25, 2012 04:03AM) (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant The men preyed on whatever they could get their mitts on. Victor X explains very straightforwardly that in Italy he couldn't get any young ladies to comply because he couldn't get anywhere near them. Did you ever see Pasolini's trilogy Canterbury Tales/1001 Nights/Decameron ? The one I remember is Canterbury tales, wherein he presents a pre-Fall Eden where everyone is up for all kinds of polymorphous perversity at the drop of a barley mow - and this is often a vision you get in some English folk songs too. This puts me in mind of the view that sees the morals of the aristocracy and the peasantry & lower classes as very similar, but the disapproving puritannical middle class are the ones who come along and erect moral edicts and begin the impose rigidities like age of consent and censorship - and this is because the middle class have somewhere to go sociologically (i.e. upwards) whereas the other two classes have nowhere to go. I realise I'm compressing a lot of material together rather too much. you may disentangle at your leisure!


message 5: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye I totally agree with your comments on puritanism and the middle class being the guardians and enforcers of morality (though there's an element of there being no such believer as a recent convert).

The upper classes can believe that morality is for the others (not them), while the lower classes can believe that morality is inflicted on them by those above.


Paul Bryant The lower classes can't sink any lower & don't care; the upper classes are bullet-proof & don't care. Only those who have a mission to improve society give a tinker's curse about who does what to whom. Of course we do think society should be improved, don't we?


message 7: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye Paul wrote: "Of course we do think society should be improved, don't we?"

Ha ha. How is one Non-U Class Warrior supposed to respond to another?


Paul Bryant in a gentlemanly fashion...


message 9: by Ian (new) - added it

Ian "Marvin" Graye Gentlemanly? I could only ever pass for a player. Leg spinner, opening bat, silly mid-on, in creams, in the way of the ball, bruised, stirred not shaken.


message 10: by Andrew (new)

Andrew Schirmer Wow. My GF (a graduate student writing a dissertation on Nabokov) came across this book today in her researches. She dully googled it and texted me: "there's a rather long review by that Paul Bryant fellow, it's rather a good one." I wonder how it compares with Frank Harris.


message 11: by Paul (new) - rated it 3 stars

Paul Bryant Thanks Andrew's GF! If you're interested in this kind of memoir, there's also Walter's "My Secret Life"

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/84...

which I have but have not read.


back to top