Kemper's Reviews > Deep Freeze
Deep Freeze (Virgil Flowers, #10)
by
by
![405390](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1715435109p2/405390.jpg)
Kemper's review
bookshelves: 2017, 5-0, crime-mystery, thriller, virgil-f-flowers, arc, 2020-reread, sandford, 2022-reread
Sep 24, 2017
bookshelves: 2017, 5-0, crime-mystery, thriller, virgil-f-flowers, arc, 2020-reread, sandford, 2022-reread
Read 3 times. Last read June 19, 2022 to June 24, 2022.
I received a free advance copy from NetGalley for review.
I got sneak preview of this one last spring when I made a long drive to attend a John Sandford signing, and he told us about the current book he was fighting a deadline on that he was going to have to spend the evening working on when he got back to the hotel. All work and no play may make Jack a dull boy, but it makes John one of the best and most productive thriller writers on the bestseller list.
It’s another hard Minnesota winter in the small town of Trippton, but there’s a spot near the sewage treatment plant where the river doesn’t freeze. That’s where the body of the lady who owned the local bank pops up, and soon state cop Virgil Flowers is on the job. Virgil is familiar with Trippton because his fishing buddy Johnson Johnson lives there, and he also worked another case there just a few books back.
Complicating the murder investigation is the side gig his bosses want Virgil to help with that involves a ring of the locals adding sound chips to Barbie dolls that make it sound as if their having orgasms and selling them on the web. The Mattel corporation has no sense of humor about these aptly named Barbie-Ohs and has dispatched a private detective to serve cease-and-desist orders, but the hard boiled lady gumshoe is having no luck tracking down the people involved. Virgil isn’t happy about such a silly distraction, but he finds out the hard way that times are so tough in this struggling small town that the people involved are desperate to keep anyone from interfering with the income they make from selling the dolls.
This is pretty typical Sandford in a lot of ways. Virgil gets a case in a rural Minnesota town, and he tries to solve it using his sneakily low key way of chatting up people and tapping into local gossip. Like most of his books we know right from the start who the killer is, and the tension comes from the cat-and-mouse game between the cop and criminal. Sandford often holds back some info from the reader that is a critical part of how the bad guy will be found and figuring that out provides the mystery element to his books rather than a straight-up whodunit. He adds a new wrinkle to that in this one because while we know who killed the woman we also know that he left the body in her house after trying to make it look like an accident. One of the interesting aspects in this one is that the killer is as confused as we are as to how she wound up in the river.
There is also all the typical Sandford stuff about Virgil having funny conversations with people, and one of the better running gags in this one is that everyone he asks about the leader of the Barbie-Oh gang acts as if they’ve never heard of her though he knows damn good and well that every one of them knows exactly who she is.
There’s one potential problem here with a big unresolved plot point. Sandford doesn’t always wrap everything up neatly, but even if the cops don’t know everything by the conclusion the reader always does. It’s also possible that he’s leaving a loose thread for a future book, but that's not really his style so it’s odd that it isn’t even mentioned in the wrap-up as a loose end. It really does seem like something that Sandford just forgot to address, but his plotting is usually air tight so it really made me scratch my head at the oversight.
Overall, it’s still another satisfying thriller from a writer whose casual readability masks how intelligent, well conceived, and executed his books really are.
I got sneak preview of this one last spring when I made a long drive to attend a John Sandford signing, and he told us about the current book he was fighting a deadline on that he was going to have to spend the evening working on when he got back to the hotel. All work and no play may make Jack a dull boy, but it makes John one of the best and most productive thriller writers on the bestseller list.
It’s another hard Minnesota winter in the small town of Trippton, but there’s a spot near the sewage treatment plant where the river doesn’t freeze. That’s where the body of the lady who owned the local bank pops up, and soon state cop Virgil Flowers is on the job. Virgil is familiar with Trippton because his fishing buddy Johnson Johnson lives there, and he also worked another case there just a few books back.
Complicating the murder investigation is the side gig his bosses want Virgil to help with that involves a ring of the locals adding sound chips to Barbie dolls that make it sound as if their having orgasms and selling them on the web. The Mattel corporation has no sense of humor about these aptly named Barbie-Ohs and has dispatched a private detective to serve cease-and-desist orders, but the hard boiled lady gumshoe is having no luck tracking down the people involved. Virgil isn’t happy about such a silly distraction, but he finds out the hard way that times are so tough in this struggling small town that the people involved are desperate to keep anyone from interfering with the income they make from selling the dolls.
This is pretty typical Sandford in a lot of ways. Virgil gets a case in a rural Minnesota town, and he tries to solve it using his sneakily low key way of chatting up people and tapping into local gossip. Like most of his books we know right from the start who the killer is, and the tension comes from the cat-and-mouse game between the cop and criminal. Sandford often holds back some info from the reader that is a critical part of how the bad guy will be found and figuring that out provides the mystery element to his books rather than a straight-up whodunit. He adds a new wrinkle to that in this one because while we know who killed the woman we also know that he left the body in her house after trying to make it look like an accident. One of the interesting aspects in this one is that the killer is as confused as we are as to how she wound up in the river.
There is also all the typical Sandford stuff about Virgil having funny conversations with people, and one of the better running gags in this one is that everyone he asks about the leader of the Barbie-Oh gang acts as if they’ve never heard of her though he knows damn good and well that every one of them knows exactly who she is.
There’s one potential problem here with a big unresolved plot point. Sandford doesn’t always wrap everything up neatly, but even if the cops don’t know everything by the conclusion the reader always does. It’s also possible that he’s leaving a loose thread for a future book, but that's not really his style so it’s odd that it isn’t even mentioned in the wrap-up as a loose end. It really does seem like something that Sandford just forgot to address, but his plotting is usually air tight so it really made me scratch my head at the oversight.
Overall, it’s still another satisfying thriller from a writer whose casual readability masks how intelligent, well conceived, and executed his books really are.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Deep Freeze.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
September 12, 2017
–
Started Reading
September 12, 2017
– Shelved
September 24, 2017
–
Finished Reading
February 17, 2020
–
Started Reading
February 19, 2020
–
Finished Reading
June 19, 2022
–
Started Reading
June 24, 2022
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-10 of 10 (10 new)
date
newest »
![Down arrow](https://cdn.statically.io/img/s.gr-assets.com/assets/down_arrow-1e1fa5642066c151f5e0136233fce98a.gif)
message 1:
by
Dan
(new)
Sep 13, 2017 12:42PM
![Dan Schwent](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1717605951p1/870755.jpg)
reply
|
flag
![Kemper](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1715435109p1/405390.jpg)
I know. I gotta find some authors that have written at least a couple of books unlike this lazy bastard.
![Kemper](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1715435109p1/405390.jpg)
I wish I enjoyed anything as much as you like pointing out typos in reviews.
![Ɗẳɳ 2.☊](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1718649427p1/12058788.jpg)
![Kemper](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1715435109p1/405390.jpg)
No apology necessary. I wasn't mad. Just being a smart ass.
![Tim](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1393183099p1/16867480.jpg)
![Kemper](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1715435109p1/405390.jpg)
Yeah, it's a bit of curveball from his usual thing where we usually get the parallel story of the hero and the villain(s). He's done this a few times like in Secret Prey which is much more of whodunit for the first half of the book although once we find out who the killer is the second half is more of a typical Sandford. And I think in Easy Prey we actually don't know the killer and only get one brief scene from their POV, and there's some twists that come in with the reveal at the end.
It also reminds me a bit of Eyes of Prey where we know the killers from the opening chapter, but the identity of a key witness is what he holds back that adds a mystery element to the whole thing.
So he's played with the formula before, but this one was a bit of a departure.