Once it is clear how should Schema provider work, we should start a RfC around that topic (to be clarified how it should work like).
Details about the schema provider are at / will be at:
Once it is clear how should Schema provider work, we should start a RfC around that topic (to be clarified how it should work like).
Details about the schema provider are at / will be at:
Status | Subtype | Assigned | Task | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Open | None | T265163 Create a system to encode best practices into editing experiences | |||
Open | None | T327563 Enable volunteers to configure Edit Check in ways that align with project policies and norms | |||
Open | None | T327655 Epic: Migration of some GrowthExperiments features into MediaWiki core | |||
Open | Feature | None | T328171 Use Community Configuration in Babel extension | ||
Open | None | T323811 [EPIC] Community configuration 2.0: Factor Community configuration out of GrowthExperiments | |||
Resolved | • Urbanecm_WMF | T344144 Community configuration 2.0: Start a RfC around Schema provider and validation | |||
Resolved | Sgs | T348227 Community configuration 2.0: Create a proof of concept version of validation |
@KStoller-WMF I'm moving this to Blocked for now to reflect reality. Once the final decision on the core/extension question is made, we can return to this one.
Draft of the RfC is available at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bJV0wtcqCtBtmPlQO23OIFCFSutx6wN5XzEDuNif7D8/edit.