Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather/Assessment
Article assessment is the process by which weather articles are sorted by quality and importance into the different quality categories and importance categories. This page provides information on the assessment scale as well as the current practice of assessing articles.
Index · Statistics · Log
Weather articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 4 | 15 | 88 | 75 | 182 | ||
FL | 1 | 4 | 31 | 47 | 83 | ||
FM | 46 | 46 | |||||
A | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
GA | 21 | 79 | 454 | 726 | 1 | 1,281 | |
B | 21 | 69 | 153 | 179 | 2 | 9 | 433 |
C | 35 | 200 | 509 | 802 | 82 | 1,628 | |
Start | 12 | 143 | 779 | 1,701 | 207 | 2,842 | |
Stub | 19 | 157 | 879 | 148 | 1,203 | ||
List | 5 | 18 | 101 | 255 | 580 | 436 | 1,395 |
Category | 2,534 | 2,534 | |||||
Disambig | 1 | 2 | 16 | 106 | 125 | ||
File | 17 | 38 | 78 | 132 | 214 | 479 | |
Portal | 2 | 611 | 613 | ||||
Project | 153 | 153 | |||||
Redirect | 4 | 41 | 135 | 497 | 677 | ||
Template | 1 | 1 | 8 | 29 | 1,140 | 1,179 | |
NA | 1 | 3 | 4 | ||||
Other | 1 | 3 | 33 | 37 | |||
Assessed | 119 | 594 | 2,403 | 4,979 | 5,919 | 883 | 14,897 |
Unassessed | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 86 | 97 | |
Total | 119 | 595 | 2,404 | 4,985 | 5,922 | 969 | 14,994 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 31,804 | Ω = 4.20 |
Instructions
[edit]Quality assessments
[edit]An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Weather}} project banner on its talk page: {{WikiProject Weather|class=???}}
The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Content assessment for assessment criteria):
FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Weather articles) | FA | |
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Weather articles) | A | |
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Weather articles) | GA | |
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Weather articles) | B | |
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Weather articles) | C | |
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Weather articles) | Start | |
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Weather articles) | Stub | |
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Weather articles) | FL | |
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Weather articles) | List |
For non-standard grades and non-mainspace content, the following values may be used for the class parameter:
Quality scale
[edit]Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
These criteria apply to general-content articles. Weather articles have additional criteria/guidelines about what sorts of content and formatting should be provided for an article of each class; see the talk page for discussion of these.
Each weather article has its assessment included inside the {{WikiProject Weather}} template, such as {{WikiProject Weather|class=B}}
. This provides automatic categorization within Category:Weather articles by quality. Note that the class parameter is case-specific; see the template's documentation for more information.
B-Class criteria
[edit]In addition to the above, B-Class articles for the WikiProject should meet the following six criteria:
B |
|
Importance assessments
[edit]An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Weather}} project banner on its talk page:
The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project (see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Priority of topic for assessment criteria):
Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Weather articles) | Top | |
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Weather articles) | High | |
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Weather articles) | Mid | |
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Weather articles) | Low | |
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Weather articles) | NA | |
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Weather articles) | ??? |
Importance scale
[edit]Importance | Criteria | Example |
---|---|---|
Top | Subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for subjects that have achieved international notability within their field. | Kindergarten |
High | Subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved international notability, or is only notable within a particular continent. | Factory Acts |
Mid | Subject is only notable within its particular field or subject and has achieved notability in a particular place or area. | 0.999... |
Low | Subject is not particularly notable or significant even within its field of study. It may only be included to cover a specific part of a notable article. | G cell |
Assessment log
[edit]July 25, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- List of F4 and EF4 tornadoes renamed to List of F4, EF4, and IF4 tornadoes.
- List of F4 and EF4 tornadoes (2020–present) renamed to List of F4, EF4, and IF4 tornadoes (2020–present).
- List of F5 and EF5 tornadoes renamed to List of F5, EF5, and IF5 tornadoes.
- Draft:Tropical Storm Bret (2023) renamed to Tropical Storm Bret (2023).
Reassessed
[edit]- 1930 Montello tornado (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- 1968 Hansell-Charles City tornado (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- 1997 Jarrell tornado (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to High-Class. (rev · t)
- 2023 Pacific typhoon season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- 2010 Yazoo City tornado (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- 2024 Ankola (Karnataka) landslide (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Hurricane Nora (2003) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- List of F4, EF4, and IF4 tornadoes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as High-Class. (rev · t)
- List of F4, EF4, and IF4 tornadoes (2020–present) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- List of F5, EF5, and IF5 tornadoes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Top-Class. (rev · t)
- Typhoon Gaemi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
July 24, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Cyclone Herwart (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Draft:Research on tornadoes in 2023 (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
July 23, 2024
[edit]Assessed
[edit]- 1967 Fairbanks Flood (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
July 22, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- 2024 Texas wildfires (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Research on tornadoes in 2024 (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Sukhovey (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Climate of the European Union (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- File:NSSL Mobile Mesonet Truck chasing the 2024 Duke, Oklahoma tornado.png (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as File-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
July 21, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- List of tornadoes spawned by tropical cyclones renamed to List of tropical cyclones spawning tornadoes.
Reassessed
[edit]- 1983 Pacific typhoon season (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from GA-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Meteorological Service of Catalonia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- List of Brazil tornadoes in 2024 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- List of tropical cyclones spawning tornadoes (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Mid-Class. (rev · t)
- Research on tornadoes in 2024 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
July 20, 2024
[edit]Reassessed
[edit]- Hurricane Beryl (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to High-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed
[edit]- Category:Climates of the Solar System (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
July 19, 2024
[edit]Renamed
[edit]- Hurricane Alley renamed to Main Development Region.
- List of tornadoes in the tornado outbreak of April 26–28, 2024 renamed to List of tornadoes in the tornado outbreak of April 25–28, 2024.
- Tornado outbreak of April 26–28, 2024 renamed to Tornado outbreak of April 25–28, 2024.
Assessed
[edit]- 2024 in the environment (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- List of tornadoes in the tornado outbreak of April 25–28, 2024 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as List-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Main Development Region (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Tornado outbreak of April 25–28, 2024 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed
[edit]- Draft:William T. Reid (talk) removed.