Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dumbass

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Content is already on Wiktionary. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:41, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Another perfectly good dictdef that I cannot imagine could ever be anything more. Jkelly 01:21, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to insult or something and add as an example there. gren グレン 01:22, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, useless dictdef. Shauri 01:22, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nonsense, it can also be redirected --.::Imdaking::. ^{Bow | DOWN} 01:23, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ASAP. Not an encyclopedic entry. Probably someone's idea of a joke, to make a page of this. ♠ DanMS 01:49, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Amren ^(talk) 04:48, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Creator using IP 24.161.115.114, home of one or more vandals. There have been ten deletions of Dumbass articles in the past. Spock: "Double Delete on you". WCFrancis 05:33, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nonsensical dic def. Would support a redirect to insult or a list of insults or something similar to avoid recreation. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:18, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Soft redirect to dumbass on Wiktionary. -- BD2412 ^talk 15:17, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Cleanup and Transwiki to Wiktionary, offensive but unfortunately very common slang.
• Delete, unencyclopedic. Smerdis of Tlön 22:46, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and protect from recreation. -- Kjkolb 01:13, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete not encyclopedic. doesn't belong on wikipedia.--Alhutch 02:15, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this dumbass misdefinition, no transwiki (it's already there). Barno 05:23, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• BJAODN Dudtz 9/29/05 6:51 PM EST
• Delete Arker 19:39, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Robert Fisk otherwise delete. Klonimus 20:35, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.