Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death By Powerpoint
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Merge and redirect to Microsoft Powerpoint -- (☺drini♫|☎) 22:29, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Dicdef, neologism. ♥purplefeltangel (talk) ♥ (contribs) 17:20, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP - 27,600 entries for "Death By Powerpoint" on Google = very notable 82.35.90.111 17:34, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Only 769 of which are unique. android79 18:05, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The Keep vote above was posted by the anonymous author of the article, 82.35.90.111 (Talk • Contributions). ♠ DanMS 21:52, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge into Microsoft PowerPoint. android79 18:05, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge as per android79 Dlyons493 19:30, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge anything retainable per Android. --Celestianpower hablamé 19:48, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I was bold and merged the content into Microsoft Powerpoint, where it worked quite well with existing content on Powerpoint criticism... as well as editing that section there, people here should feel free to redirect or delete the AfD as they feel appropriate. Alba 22:14, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Such a merge completely invalidates any delete votes already made here, as the article must now be redirected to comply with the GFDL. Please do not perform any such merges during an ongoing AFD in the future. android79 22:24, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It should be clearer that you shouldn't merge or redirect while a nomination is still open. I've seen several admins and veteran users do it. Can this be added to the AfD notice? There's a link on it already, but apparently it's not enough. -- Kjkolb 02:15, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It used to explicitly warn against moving or merging. I don't know when/why that was removed from the template. android79 05:00, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It should be clearer that you shouldn't merge or redirect while a nomination is still open. I've seen several admins and veteran users do it. Can this be added to the AfD notice? There's a link on it already, but apparently it's not enough. -- Kjkolb 02:15, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Such a merge completely invalidates any delete votes already made here, as the article must now be redirected to comply with the GFDL. Please do not perform any such merges during an ongoing AFD in the future. android79 22:24, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge anything retainable and redirect per GFDL needs. - Mgm|(talk) 08:52, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.