Victor Macedo

This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (July 2024)

Victor Macedo
Photograph of Victor Macedo c. 1915
Born	Victor Macedo
Nationality	Peruvian
Occupation	General manager for the Peruvian Amazon Company

Victor Macedo was employed by Julio César Arana and his rubber firm as an administrator between 1903 and 1910 during the Putumayo genocide. Macedo was the general manager of the Peruvian Amazon Company's agency at La Chorrera on the Igara Paraná River, Columbia, between 1907 and 1911. In June 1911, 215 arrest warrants were issued against employees of La Chorrera for their role in perpetrating the Putumayo genocide. Macedo's arrest warrant was issued in July of that year and he was arrested in August but a prefect of Lima released him from incarceration. In 1914, Macedo was reported to be in Bolivia near the border with Brazil along with several other former managers of the La Chorrera agency.

Julio César Arana and his rubber firm employed Victor Macedo as an administrator at La Chorrera, Colombia, during the Putumayo genocide.^[2][3][4] The rubber firms that controlled La Chorrera were dependent on an enslaved workforce to extract raw rubber, which would then be sent to the port at La Chorrera.^[5][6] Years before the Peruvian Amazon Company came into existence, rubber patrons like Macedo would expand their workforce by trading metal tools like axes or machetes for a year of work or a ten-year-old child.^[7] Another method frequently employed at La Chorrera's agency were correrías, slave raids in which many natives were either captured or killed.^[8][9][10] According to Pedro Flores speaking in 1975, while at La Chorerra, Macedo implemented the weight quota of rubber that was imposed against the native workforce.^[7][a] During Macedo's management, the agency at La Corerra exploited indigenous groups, including Huitotos, Andoques, Ocaina, Yurias, Resígaro and Boras.^[11][12][13]

Macedo was implicated in a massacre of Ocaina natives at La Chorrera in 1903; this incident became the subject of a criminal complaint journalist Benjamin Saldaña Rocca filed,^[14] which eventually led to the issuing of more than 215 arrest warrants against employees of the La Chorrera' agency in the Putumayo River basin.^[15][16][17] In July 1911, judge Carlos A. Valcárcel issued an arrest warrant against Macedo for his role in the atrocities that occurred in the Putumayo between 1903 and 1911 under his management.^[18][19][20]

Rómulo Paredes, a judge who investigated the Putumayo genocide in 1911, believed the first massacres in the region began under Larrañaga's leadership and continued under Macedo's administration.^[21][22] In the ninth chapter of his 1915 book El Proceso del Putumayo y sus secretos, Valcarcel examines the culpability of Macedo, Arana, Pablo Zumaeta and Juan B. Vega for the conditions in the region, the evidence collected by the 1911 commission that incriminates the senior managers with the atrocities, and Paredes's explanation for why they were not prosecuted.^[23][24] Paredes became convinced crimes in the Putumayo been committed with Macedo's knowledge and approval, and that Macedo had personally perpetrated crimes and abuse against the natives.^[25]

The British Foreign Office sent diplomat Roger Casement to investigate the role of Barbadian men employed at La Chorrera in the atrocities in the Putumayo and reports of abuse against Barbadians. Macedo organized multiple armed excursions against Colombians and natives during his management of the agency. Barbadian men took part in several of these raids and later gave depositions to Casement reporting crimes they had witnessed and perpetrated against the natives.^[b] Casement interviewed thirty Barbadians, many of whom had worked around the La Chorrera agency for years; two of them told Casement Macedo was aware of the crimes occurring in the region.^[29][c] Casement wrote: "Macedo was one of Arana's longest serving Chiefs of Section and had an established history of brutality".^[31]

The Peruvian Amazon Company paid Macedo and the managers based on how much rubber was collected in their respective sections.^[32][33] Casement believed the company paid Macedo around £2,000–£3,500 annually, and possibly more.^[34] According to the payroll at La Chorrera in 1910, Macedo's salary was £30 a month along with a commission of six percent on the profit made from his agency.^[35][36] Hardenburg said the company paying its employees by a commission incentivized them to collect and export as much rubber as possible in a short time, and this could either be done by paying the natives or terrorizing them into submission. He said because Arana's company did not believe in paying natives for their labor, the "rule of terror" had been applied throughout the company's estate.^[37][d]

Paredes made a similar conclusion to Hardenburg regarding commissions paid to the managers. He believed these contracts incentivized the managers to exploit and extort natives into collecting as much rubber as possible in a short time. Indigenous men, women, children and elderly people were compelled to work for Arana's firm, and were subjected to cruel punishment or death when they failed to meet the obligations imposed upon them. Paredes wrote: "[h]unger has been perhaps the most terrible scourge which has fallen on the Putumayo" and that station chiefs did not allow natives enough time to cultivate food to sustain themselves.^[38]

In 1906, during Macedo's management, there were around forty stations between the Igara-Paraná River and the Caqueta River that delivered rubber to La Chorrera.^[39][6] The natives under La Chorrera's agency suffered systematic starvation during Macedo's administration. Several of Chorrera's stations suffered from famine due to the conditions imposed by the managers, notably at the stations at Atenas, Matanzas, Abisinia^[e], and Ultimo Retiro. The managers Elias Martinengui^[41][42] and Armando Normand^[43][44][45] both gave their natives little-to-no time to cultivate food.^[f] While at Entre Rios in 1910, Casement wrote in his journal: "Macedo is alleged to have said: 'The Indians are not here to plant chacaras [(food gardens)]. They are here to get rubber.' "^{[47][48][49][50]} Saldaña Rocca, Casement, Hardenburg and Paredes had also collected information on several cases at La Chorrera where starvation was used as a means for capital punishment.^[51][52] The use of cepos, a device similar to a pillory, was reported at La Chorrera, Matanzas, Entre Rios, Atenas, Ultimo Retiro, Abisinia, Occidente, Santa Catalina and other stations that were under Macedo's administration.^[53][54]

At the end of a list titled "Names of the worst criminals on the Putumayo when I was there", Casement wrote: "All the above were chiefs of section ie. principal agents in full authority over a certain district acting under the general supervision of Victor Macedo—the principal agent at La Chorrera".^[55][g]

The date on which Victor Macedo arrived in the Putumayo region is unknown. Macedo was working with the Larrañaga family and Julio César Arana^[h] as early as 1903 at an important settlement located below a waterfall named "Colonia Indiana", which was later known as La Chorrera.^[2][3][4] In 1903, Arana hired French explorer Eugène Robuchon to map his estate in the Putumayo;^[58][59] a map of this territory is shown in Robuchon's book En el Putumayo, y Sus Afluentes, where it is written that the map was drawn up for Macedo, manager of the J.C. Arana y Hermanos firm at La Chorrera.^[60][61] Benjamin Larrañaga died at La Chorrera on December 22, 1903, and shortly afterward Arana acquired Rafael Larrañaga's share of the estate.^[62][63] Juan B. Vega and Arana continued their partnership and established Arana, Vega y Compania, which employed Macedo as a manager at La Chorrera.^[64][65]

In late 1904, the first group of Barbadian men hired by Arana's firm arrived at La Chorrera and were dispatched from La Chorrera on November 17, 1904, to establish the station at Matanzas near the Caqueta River in a territory inhabited by the indigenous Andoque people.^[66][i] There were twenty-five Barbadian men and ten other men of different nationalities, including their Colombian manager Ramon Sanchez, and Armando Normand, who was hired as an agent and translator for the firm.^[68][62]

Normand and Sanchez physically abused two of these Barbadians.^[j] El Proceso includes a letter Macedo wrote to a manager regarding two Barbadians who attempted to run away after they were tied up and mistreated. Macedo wanted this manager to make it clear to the Barbadians Ramon Sanchez was responsible for their abuse, and said it would be detrimental if these Barbadians proceeded against the La Chorrera agency.^[71] Sanchez was dismissed due to reports of the mistreatment of Barbadians but the agency continued to employ Normand, who eventually became the chief manager of Matanzas.^[72][73][2]

In 1906, Robuchon disappeared in the Putumayo near Ultimo Retiro in territory managed by the La Chorrera agency; it was rumored Arana had him disappeared because he had taken incriminating photographs of abuse that was occurring in the region. All of Robuchon's photographs were taken around La Chorrera and several of the pictures were used as evidence of slavery and physical torment under Arana's firm.^[74] Macedo conducted a census with the aid of an agent named Manuel Torrico;^[75][76] the estimate of 50,000 natives living in the Putumayo River basin, as recorded in Robuchon's book, may have come from this census.^[77]

In 1906, Macedo ordered Normand to organize a correría against a group of Colombians who were attempting to establish a rubber station near the Lower Caqueta. This attack resulted in the capture of Aquileo Torres and around ten other Colombians who worked for the rubber company Urbano Gutiérrez. Some of the captured natives were clubbed to death.^[78] Eight of the Colombians were sent to La Chorrera, which was under the management of Macedo. These Colombians were later taken on a company steamship and left near the Brazilian border with a canoe.^[79][80] One of the Colombians Roso España testified to authorities in Manaus that after Normand's group killed 25 natives, the group proceeded to murder women and children in the area. Torres and two of the senior employees who worked for Urbano Gutierrez were kept as prisoners at Abisinia and suffered maltreatment. Torres eventually agreed to work for the company.^[81][k] According to Hardenburg (1912):

Another common form of punishment is that of mutilations, such as cutting off arms, legs, noses, ears, penises, hands, feet, and even heads. Castrations are also a popular punishment for such crimes as trying to escape, for being lazy, or for being stupid, while frequently they employ these forms of mutilation merely to relieve the monotony of continual floggings and murders and to provide a sort of recreation. The victims generally die within a few days, or if they do not die they are murdered, for it is said that in 1906 Macedo issued an order to his subordinates advising them to kill all mutilated Indians at once for the following reasons: first, because they consumed food although they could not work; and second, because it looked bad to have these mutilated wretches running about.^[l][83]

Macedo was first publicly implicated in the Putumayo genocide by Benjamin Saldaña Rocca on August 9, 1907, through a criminal petition filed against eighteen members of the J.C. Arana y Hermanos firm.^[85][86] Macedo's name was the first on the list compiled by Saldaña. Saldaña later decided to establish his own newspaper publications, which he would use to publicly campaign against Arana's firm.^[85][87][88] On August 22, the first issue of La Sancion included content from Saldaña's original petition and a letter from Julio Muriedas, an ex-employee of La Chorrera's agency. This letter detailed Muriedas' employment at Matanzas under Normand, and some of the methods of abuse he employed against the natives in his district, as well as the killing of these natives for not meeting a weight quota of rubber.^[89] Saldaña claimed that Macedo and his counterpart Loayza were responsible for the crimes of "swindling, robbery, incendiarism, poisoning and assassination" that was aggravated by "tortures by fire, water, the lash and mutilation" occurring under their management. The first issue also provided an account of the 1903 Ocaina massacre, claiming that Macedo and Loayza had orchestrated the killings.^[90][91]

Juan Castanos, a Saldaña deponent^[m] and manager of Porvenir, wanted passage to Iquitos so he could leave the Putumayo. Macedo opposed this because Castanos did not have enough money to pay for his passage on the steamship Liberal. Castanos later obtained enough money for the journey but the captain refused to have him on the ship. Afterward, Castano's wife was dragged away and Macedo allowed Bartolomé Zumaeta to take her as a concubine.^[90][93][n]

On September 6, 1907, Arana and several English investors founded the Peruvian Amazon Company, which acquired the assets of the Arana Hermanos firm.^[95][96] At the time, Macedo was the general manager of the La Chorrera agency, a position he retained in the new company.^[97][98][o] According to the company's prospectus published by Carlos Rey de Castro, the agency consisted of forty rubber stations.^[39]

On November 19, 1907, in an article published by Benjamin Saldaña Rocca, Reynaldo Torres said Macedo, Rafael Larranaga, and Jacob Barchillon had directed the 1903 massacre of Ocainas and this incident was denounced by Aristides Rodriguez.^[100][p][q] Macedo and several other perpetrators of the massacre were arrested but Macedo escaped and returned to La Chorrera via the Napo River. Afterward, the Arana company "hushed things up" by paying 500,000 Peruvian soles, equivalent to about £50,000 at the time, in bribes.^[14][r] Torres wanted to leave the service of the company but was not permitted. When the prefect Carlos Zapata inquired about this, Macedo stated Torres was free to leave as long as he paid his debts, and at the time he could not afford to do so.^[103]

Near the end of 1907, the Peruvian Amazon Company published an essay written by Macedo that established a narrative for the massacre of Ocaina natives in 1903. According to Macedo, only three Peruvian employees were present,^[s] and the essay does not mention the Peruvian garrison at La Chorrera. Macedo stated the Colombians perpetrated the massacre, and that he and Miguel S. Loayza did not leave their rooms because the Colombians had anti-Peruvian sentiments. In the essay, Macedo said he and Loayza were junior employees.^[104][t]

Saldaña was forced to flee Iquitos due to pressure from Arana but American engineer Walter Ernest Hardenburg obtained Saldaña's documents and continued Saldaña's work.^{[106][107][u]} Along with testimonies Saldaña collected, Hardenburg collected more than twenty depositions that reported crimes Arana's firm perpetrated against indigenous peoples.^{[110][111][v]} By the time of Hardenburg's journey through the Putumayo in 1908, Macedo was general manager of La Chorrera and the most-senior employee of the agency.^[25]

Among Hardenburg's deponents was firefighter Daniel Collantes, who in 1902 was employed on a river launch owned by Arana before Macedo ordered him to transfer to a rubber station. Collantes stated he refused to do so because he was aware crimes were perpetrated in the forest, and he was imprisoned at La Chorrera for ten days for his refusal. When Collantes complained to Macedo, Macedo gave an order for Collantes to be whipped 100 times and for his mouth to be covered so he would not cry.^[113] In his deposition, Collantes said the massacre of Ocaina natives occurred 150 m (490 ft) away from the headquarters at La Chorrera, and that there were forty natives rather than thirty.^[114] These natives arrived as prisoners and were detained together in chains in a cell. Collantes stated at 4:00 a.m. the next morning, Macedo ordered eighteen employees from the section of La Sabana to flog the imprisoned natives to death. Hours later, Macedo ordered the employees to drag the natives out of the cell, shoot them and cremate their remains. According to Collantes, the collection of firewood and kerosene began at 9:00 a.m. and Macedo gave the order for the fire to begin at 12:00 a.m.^[115][116]

According to Collantes, shortly after the massacre he told Macedo he wished to leave the company and journey to Iquitos: "[t]he reply this miserable criminal gave me was to threaten me with more chains and imprisonment, telling me that he was the only one who gave orders in this region and that all who lived here were subject to his commands."^[115][117] Collantes also reported information on a correría Jose Innocente Fonseca led on Macedo's orders. Macedo ordered Fonseca to organize a commission of twenty men to travel towards the Caqueta and kill any Colombians they found there. The members of this commission were told to bring back the fingers, ears and severed heads of their victims. These body parts were shown to Macedo and Miguel S. Loayza, the general manager of the company's agency at El Encanto.^[118] Celestino Lopez wrote to Hardenburg and said he "also saw Dancurt, the official executioner of La Chorrera, flog the poor Indians almost daily for the most trivial faults: all with the knowledge and approbation of Victor Macedo, manager of La Chorrera and Justice of the Peace of the Putumayo".^[119]

According to Barbadian John Brown, Macedo was present during some instances of flagellation by Dancurt of indigenous people on Macedo's orders. When Thomas Whiffen arrived at La Chorrera, the punishment of natives in public ceased "and everything was done to hide from Capt. Whiffen the true facts of the case".^[40] Barbadian James Chase believed Macedo sent an agent to warn each section of Whiffen's arrival so Whiffen would not see anything incriminating.^[120] Frederick Bishop, another Barbadian, reported Whiffen's movements were monitored while he was in the Putumayo and any evidence of atrocities was "cleared up" before he would arrive at his next destination.^[121] Whiffen was told Macedo would be dismissed and that reforms would be made.^[122]

In September 1909, Hardenburg began publishing a series of articles in Truth, a small newspaper. The first article, titled "The Devil's Paradise: A British-Owned Congo", made a comparison between conditions in the Putumayo River basin and atrocities in the Congo Free State.^[123] Some of Hardenburg's reporting directly implicated station managers under Macedo with murder and torture.^[124] In response to the Truth articles, the Peruvian Amazon Company decided to send a commercial commission to investigate the conditions in the region, and the British Foreign Office sent Consul-General Roger Casement to inspect the treatment of Barbadian men in the region.^[125][w] Prior to 1910, Macedo became justice of the peace in the Putumayo, which was a government position.^[126][127]

In March 1910, Augusto Jiménez Seminario led a correría from Ultimo Retiro across the Caqueta into Colombian territory, capturing three Colombians and twenty-one natives.^[27] The raid was carried out under Macedo's direct orders. Macedo signed a document of monetary gratification dated February 25, 1910, that was administered to members of the raid who Jiménez thought performed satisfactorily.^[128][x]

Macedo and Juan A. Tízon received Casement and the company commissioners at La Chorrera on September 22, 1910.^[31][y] Casement thought if Macedo attended the interviews with the Barbadians, he would attempt to make a formal enquiry for the courts in Iquitos to investigate them with the intent of making the Barbadians "scapegoats, both to justify Macedo and clear the Peruvian authorities too, and also to destroy any real evidence of the wholesale crimes that have been allowed for years in this unhappy region".^[131] Casement decided to have Tízon present for the interviews, and while Macedo stood and listened at the door for a time, he was not invited so he walked off.^[132][133] Casement also thought Macedo would attempt to bribe the Barbadians to lie.^[134][98] A Barbadian named Frederick Bishop persuaded many of the other Barbadians to testify to Casement before Macedo and Normand had the opportunity to coerce them into silence.^[135] In his deposition, Bishop reported in January 1909, Macedo had him "put in guns", a punishment in which a detainee was held in an uncomfortable position at the point of several guns. The victim would then be whipped. The order was carried out by the commander of La Chorrera's garrison, a captain of the Peruvian military.^[136]

Bishop stated: "Macedo knew what happened often in the sections, as he visited them and saw prisoners and flogging".^[137] Donald Francis told Bishop Macedo had threatened to have him shot if he reported anything against Macedo.^[138] Francis, Edward Crichlow and James Lane said Macedo offered them bribes.^{[139][140][141]} Casement asked Stanley Sealy why he did not report any of the crimes to Macedo; Sealy said there was no point in doing so because "he had believed señor Macedo knew all about the wrong things done".^[142] Joshua Dyall provided the same reasoning as Sealy when Casement asked him if he reported any killings to Macedo.^[143] Dyall had been physically abused by Alfredo Montt, "badly flogged", beaten with a gun, and when he complained about this treatment to Macedo, Macedo ordered him to go to Ultimo Retiro and he was threatened with being tied up and flogged again.^[144] Adolphus Gibbs told Casement both Augusto Jiménez and Macedo had struck him because he wanted to leave the company.^[145] Macedo gave an indigenous concubine to the Barbadian Evelyn Batson around November 1908.^[146] A Barbadian named Norman Walcott told Casement in November 1909, he witnessed Victor Macedo flogging an native man of around eighteen years old. Walcott did not report any other cases of abuse to Roger Casement.^[147]

At La Chorrera, Casement saw Macedo's son playing with a young girl whose father had been "killed by his own muchachos". Casement believed this case was representative of the relationship dynamic between the muchachos de confianza and their exploiters.^[148][z] While discussing the accounts of the Barbadian men with Casement, Macedo offered to remove 25% of the debts they owed.^[149] Casement interpreted the offer as a bribe meant to silence him.^[150][aa] Casement also noted Macedo sent at least two agents to warn the chiefs of sections about Casement's presence during his investigation.^[153][154] According to Tízon, the station at Matanzas had been operating at a "dead loss for some time" by 1910. The commissions for Normand and Macedo, as well as the expenditure for the Matanzas station's necessities – including employees' salaries – absorbed all of the station's potential profits.^[32]

While watching the delivery of rubber from the Sur station in 1910, Casement asked Omarino, a young native, if he wanted to go to London with Casement.^[ab] Omarino agreed and his captain requested a "shirt and a pair of trousers";^[ac] Macedo sanctioned this transaction for Omarino's freedom.^[156][ad] Near the end of Casement's investigation, Macego gave an indigenous woman to Abelardo Aguero as a gift.^[157]

Macedo gifted Casement a chiviclis, a "small rodent-like animal", prior to his departure from La Chorrera in November.^[ae] After Casement's investigation in 1910, Pablo Zumaeta's brother-in-law Amadeo Burga^[159] succeeded Macedo as the justice of the peace.^[127] Macedo was also superseded by Tízon as the chief agent at La Chorrera.^[160] While Casement was returning to Iquitos via the Liberal, the ship stopped at Recreio, a settlement at the mouth of the Yaguas River. Casement witnessed four natives paddling in a canoe with a man and a woman, and the captain of the Liberal stated the natives had been given as a gift from Macedo.^[161][af]

Macedo left the Putumayo on Liberal with Andrés O'Donnell and the Commercial Commission in February 1911, prior to the arrival at La Chorrera of Rómulo Paredes and his judicial commission.^[163] Macedo had around 80,000 soles (£8,000) after his dismissal from the Peruvian Amazon Company, £2,000 of which came from a special gratification paid to him by Pablo Zumaeta.^[164] Upon their arrival in Iquitos, Macedo and a man named Zegarra^[ag] were interrogated by the sub-prefect, who said there was no evidence against Macedo and Zegarra.^[165]

In his statement at Iquitos, Macedo said he was not aware a massacre had occurred until the next day. He said he "knew from references Benjamin Larrañaga and Loayza were present" at the massacre; however, he stated they could not prevent the massacre because Larrañaga was drunk at the time, and Macedo and Loayza were junior employees. He also stated there were twenty-five victims of this massacre. In his deposition, Macedo gave testimony about several killings by Colombians in the region before 1907, most notably Crisostomo Hernandez, and he also said an uprising in 1905 at Ultimo Retiro was instigated by Gregorio Calderón. Macedo also accused Colombians of instigating the 1909 mutiny that led to the death of Buccelli and three other agents.^[166] Miguel Flores also participated in the 1903 massacre.^[167] Flores had perpetrated killings of so many natives at La Chorrera Macedo reprimanded him for this and told him to only kill natives when they stopped delivering rubber.^[168][90]

In his statement, Isaac Escurra said he saw eleven adult natives – ten men and one woman who had a child – who were imprisoned in the cepo next to Macedo's room. Carlos Miranda had these natives whipped, after which they were kept in the cepo for three days without food. During those three days, Escurra told Macedo these natives should have been receiving something to eat but they were not given anything. Macedo gave an order to have lime poured over the eleven natives after an employee complained they were starting to smell bad due to their wounds rotting. Afterward, Escurra stated Macedo ignored the fate of these imprisoned natives. In his deposition, Escurra also stated he saw dogs consuming the heads of two natives at La Chorrera; according to Macedo, the heads belonged to natives who had died from smallpox. Escurra did not believe this was the truth.^[169] While eating at a table in La Chorrea along with Macedo and several other station chiefs, Escurra denounced to Macedo the crimes he had witnessed Elias Martinengui commit at Atenas but he was told "not to speak of those things in public, but to come to his office for a talk".^[170][171] Macedo told Escurra he knew everyone at the table was a criminal and he did not need to be told so. Macedo said it would be impossible for work in the region to proceed if he hired decent people because the natives could only be dominated through rigor. According to Valcarcel, this statement may explain why there were so many criminals in the Putumayo.^[170] Escurra later went to a member of the Iquitos superior court who told him to keep quiet and that Arana was expected in Iquitos and Escurra could talk to him then.^[171] Jose Plaza, another employee at La Chorrea's agency, denounced Alfredo Montt's crimes to Macedo; in response Macedo sent Plaza to the station at La Sabana, which was managed by Aristides Rodriguez.^[172]

El Proceso del Putumayo y sus secretos inauditos contains eight eyewitness accounts of the massacre, including one by Macedo.^[ah] Deponent Emilio Mozambite said Macedo witnessed the massacre but he did not participate. Macedo said the massacre was directed by Rafael Larranaga and was carried out as retribution for an uprising that occurred that year and resulted in the death of a Colombian rubber patron and his employees.^[167] Santiago Portocarrero said both Macedo and Loayza had knowledge of the crimes perpetrated in their agencies; Portocarrero was confident about this because he had overheard these bosses talking about the crime.^[170] Eusebio Pinedo also said Macedo and Loayza witnessed the massacre but did not participate.^[173] Deponent Gregorio Arimuya said Macedo and Loayza witnessed the massacre but did not participate. At the end of Arimuya's statement, he reported Aymenes natives were flogged by Peruvian soldiers under the orders of a lieutenant Risco at La Chorrera.^[174] Esetan Angulo's testimony corroborated Arimuya's statement about Peruvian soldiers flogging natives at La Chorrera. Fifteen natives suffered this punishment because they refused to collect rubber and in retaliation, Rafael Larrañaga ordered them to be flogged. Angulo stated some of the Peruvian soldiers garrisoned at Chorrera helped carry out the flagellation.^[175][ai] This information regarding the Peruvian garrison at La Chorrera contradicts Macedo's claim from his 1907 statement where he said the Peruvians could not intervene during the massacre of Ocainas because there were only three Peruvians employees at La Chorrera . The Peruvian garrison at La Chorrera was first established in 1902.^{[177][178][aj]}

The judge investigated the scene of the 1903 Ocaina massacre at La Chorrera and collected enough evidence to confirm the massacre had taken place.^[4] The massacre of Puineses and Renuicueses natives that occurred in 1903 at La Chorrera was also confirmed; a large amount of bones were discovered and there was evidence a fire had occurred in that location.^[180] After interviewing Macedo and several other Peruvian Amazon Company employees in 1911, the judge said: "[a]lthough Macedo and Loayza witnessed these events, it has not been proven that they took part in it".^[181]

Paredes wrote: "[a]ccording to the evidence taken in the enquiry it would seem that the fire massacre in La Chorrera gave rise to these chiefs. The execution of thirty Ocainas Indians, [who were] tortured and burned alive, was thus a sort of patent, a diploma for governing sanctions."^[182] Based on the information he examined, Casement believed: "[t]his crime was committed by Victor Macedo's direction, and on the strength of this act of fortitude he became eventually the chief of all sections as general manager at La Chorrera, deriving from his presidency of crime an income of well over £3,000 a year."^[182]

Paredes said a population in the Putumayo River basin Carlos Rey de Castro estimated to be 50,000 natives had fallen to 8,000 between 1906 and 1911.^[183][ak] The 1907 Peruvian Amazon Company prospectus said there were 40,000 "Indian 'labourers' " in the region at the time.^{[77][186][59]}

Paredes said he spared no effort in attempting to capture several of the "worst criminals" but that Macedo had assisted them in leaving from the region before the judge's arrival.^[46] After saying Macedo wrote a letter to the prefect of Loreto denying the massacre in 1903 occurred, Paredes wrote: "it is perfectly defined that Macedo is a concealer of such crimes: that furthermore Macedo has taken advantage of and assisted the criminals to take advantage of the crime".^[187]

Following the Paredes investigation, three sets of arrest warrants were issued against men who had worked in the Putumayo for Arana's rubber firm. The first set was issued against twenty-two individuals who were implicated in the massacre of Ocaina natives in September 1903, charging them with "the crime of flogging and flaying thirty Ocaina Indians and then burning them alive". The second set of warrants was issued on June 29 against 215 employees of the agency at La Chorrera.^[18][19][al]

Judge Valcárcel issued Macedo's arrest warrant on July 29, 1911, along with a warrant for Pablo Zumaeta and several other Peruvian Amazon Company employees against whom who Paredes did not proceed.^[18][20] In August, the mayor of Lima and the prefect of Callao sent telegraphs to the Paredes with a request to dismiss the arrest warrant against Macedo.^[188][189] One of these telegrams said Macedo had influential friends in Lima.^[188] Seymour Bell, a member of the 1910 commission, stated that members of the Peruvian Congress had also sent telegraphs protesting Macedo's arrest warrant.^[189][am]

Casement's source stated Macedo was in Lima between September and October 1911.^[190] Lucien Jerome, an English consul general at Lima, stated Macedo had been living openly in the city and that when the local authorities investigated Macedo’s last known address, there was no sign of him but it was determined he had recently left.^[191]

Judge Paredes later showed several telegrams to Casement that were sent by "highly placed individuals in Lima" that requested the dismissal of Macedo's warrant.^[192] Several of these individuals include the deputies to Congress Hildebrando Fuentes and Ingoyen Canseco, and Emilio Rodriguez Larrain, the secretary to the President of Peru Augusto B. Leguía.^[193][194] Larrain had sent a telegraph to a member of the Iquitos courts asking why there was a warrant issued against Macedo and requesting the dismissal of that warrant. This led Valcárcel to believe Larrain was responsible for Macedo's release.^[195] A former prefect of Lima Pedro Garezon reported Macedo had been captured but Garezon released Macedo instead of sending him to Iquitos. Julio Ego-Aguirre, who succeeded Garezon as the prefect of Lima and also served as the lawyer for Julio César Arana,^[196] said: "he had not found Macedo in detention" when he was asked to send Macedo to Iquitos.^[197][an] Paredes issued the warrant on the basis of a Peruvian law that stated: "[w]hen there is a corpus delicti, simple indications of guilt are sufficient to order the arrest of the accused".^[199][ao]

Eduardo and Francisco Lanatta were employed as lawyers in Iquitos for Macedo during the judicial proceedings against him. There were allegations the Lanatta brothers had unofficial business dealings with Paredes but Paredes refuted this in El Proceso, noting he would not have issued an arrest warrant for Macedo if there was an agreement between the Lanatta brothers and himself.^[200] Valcárcel, who originally filed the arrest warrants against Macedo and Pablo Zumaeta, was dismissed from his office on October 31, 1911, by the Superior Court of Iquitos.^[20]

Victor Macedo was reported to have secured passage on a ship heading towards Barbados in November 1911, and from there he traveled to Manaus.^[201] Macedo, Armando Normand and several other Peruvian Amazon Company employees were seen in Manaus by a Barbadian informant who wrote to Casement.^[202][ap] In December 1911, Macedo was again reported to have been in Manaus along with Arana but the nature of this encounter was unknown to Casement's informant.^[203] Near the end of 1911, Macedo went to Iquitos to defend himself in court and Casement said: "[t]he Superior Court will probably go down in a body to greet him & have him to dinner".^[204]

On October 17, 1912, it was reported Jimenez and Macedo were together in Bolivia at Cobiga, and the Aguero was nearby.^[205] In 1914, The Anti-Slavery Reporter and Aborigines' Friend published an article titled "The Putumayo Criminals" that was based on details provided by one of its informants. This informant stated Victor Macedo was frequently traveling around Manaus, the Japurá River and the Acre River with financial assistance for his activities provided by Arana. Macedo was also traveling with E. Mozambite – presumably Emilio Mozambite – and Fidel Velarde, one of his station chiefs.^[206] Abelardo Aguero, Augusto Jiménez and Carlos Miranda, three of Macedo's station chiefs at La Chorrera, were also in Bolivia close to the border with Brazil, where they continued to exploit natives to extract rubber.^[206][207] In April 2014, both Jimenez and Aguero were arrested on an estate belonging to the rubber baron Nicolás Suárez Callaú but the Bolivian Consul who reported their arrest said Macedo had left the area before the authorities arrived.^[207] After April 1914, there were no further reports regarding the whereabouts of Macedo.

• Peruvian Amazon Company
• Putumayo genocide
• Julio César Arana
• Miguel S. Loayza

• Chirif, Alberto; Chaparro, Manuel (2009). Imaginario e imagenes de la epoca del caucho: Los sucesos del Putumayo. p. 230. ISBN 978-9972-608-27-8.
• Hardenburg, Walter (1912). The Putumayo, the Devil's Paradise; Travels in the Peruvian Amazon Region and an Account of the Atrocities Committed Upon the Indians Therein. London: Fischer Unwin. ISBN 1372293019.
• Valcárcel, Carlos (2004). El proceso del Putumayo y sus secretos inauditos. The International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.
• Slavery in Peru: Message from the President of the United States Transmitting Report of the Secretary of State, with Accompanying Papers, Concerning the Alleged Existence of Slavery in Peru. United States. Department of State. 1913. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
• Robuchon, Eugène; Rey de Castro, Carlos (1907). En el Putumayo y sus afluentes (in Spanish). Imprenta La industria. ISBN 9785880223091.
• Casement, Roger (1997). The Amazon Journal of Roger Casement. Anaconda Editions. ISBN 1901990052. Retrieved September 16, 2023.
• Parliamentary Papers: Select Committee on the Putumayo. House of Commons or House of Lords Papers. 1913.
• Casement, Roger (2003). Mitchell, Angus (ed.). Sir Roger Casement's Heart of Darkness: The 1911 Documents. Irish Manuscripts Commission. ISBN 9781874280989.
• Paternoster, Sidney (1913). The Lords of the Devil's Paradise. S. Paul & Company.
• Goodman, Jordan (2009). The Devil and Mr Casement: One Man's Struggle for Human Rights in South America's Heart of Darkness. London: Verso. ISBN 9781844673346.
• The Anti-slavery Reporter and Aborigines' Friend. L. Wild. 1914.
• Putumayo: la vorágine de las caucherías segunda parte. Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica. 2014.
• "The Anti-slavery reporter and aborigines' friend". The Anti-slavery Reporter and Aborigines' Friend. 1–3. 1909–1914.
• Hardenburg, Walter (1912). Transcript of 'The Devil's Paradise. / A catalogue of crime' by W. E. Hardenburg. National Library of Ireland.
• Thomson, Norman (1913). The Putumayo Red Book with an Introduction on the Real Scandal of the Putumayo Atrocities. N. Thomson & Company.