User talk:MusicforthePeople/Talk archive/2017

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MusicforthePeople/Talk_archive/2017.

To-do list for User:MusicforthePeople/Talk archive/2017: Reminders or things I plan on doing at some point along the line: Cite Bastards of Young documentary Go through Radio & Records issues for radio singles Go through every Punknews.org news post for anything useful Need to do further work on... (Bold – up for GAN · * – sent/ready to send for C/E REQ) This Is How the Wind Shifts · Life's Not out to Get You · Lower Than Atlantis · No Closer to Heaven · Back in Denim · Safe in Sound · Night People* · Zombies on Broadway* · Happiness Is · Tidal Wave · So Long, Astoria · Vheissu* · Say Hello to Sunshine* · Let It Enfold You* · Still Searching‎* · Cavalier Youth* · Good Morning Revival* · Cardiology · Sticks and Stones · Catalyst · VI* · The Pop Underground · Andrew McMahon in the Wilderness* · The Needles the Space · Upside Down Flowers · Palm Trees and Power Lines* · Start Static · La Petite Mort · The Morning After · The Night Before · Hey Ma · Pleased to Meet You · Millionaires · Very Emergency* · Nothing Feels Good · Orange Rhyming Dictionary* · Four Cornered Night* · Perfecting Loneliness · The Rising Tide* · The Moon Is Down · How to Start a Fire · Hide Nothing · Dream to Make Believe · Do You Know Who You Are? · Emotion Is Dead* · Love · Everynight Fire Works* · Loses Control · United by Fate · Pedals · New Found Glory · Chase This Light* · Invented* · Damage* · Integrity Blues* · Surviving · Modern Nature · From Here to Infirmary · Free All Angels* · Meltdown* · Twilight of the Innocents* · Kablammo!* · Islands* · Whiplash* · Stutter* · Strip-mine* · Gold Mother · Seven · Suckapunch* · Grey Will Fade* · Escape from Rubbish Island · Suspended by Stars* · Nightmare of You · Exit English · Anthem* · Ocean Avenue* · The Ugly Organ · Coral Island* · Move Through the Dawn‎ · The Coral · Magic and Medicine* · The Invisible Invasion‎* · Roots & Echoes* · All the Colours of You* · The Deep Blue* · New Worlds* · Love Is Here* · Hope Is Important‎* · 100 Broken Windows‎* · The Remote Part* · Warnings/Promises* · Drawn from Memory* · If You've Never Been · In Our Gun · Liquid Skin · Friends and Lovers* · Anchors Aweigh* · Universal Audio* · Hate* · 24 Hour Revenge Therapy · Squirrel and G-Man Twenty Four Hour Party People Plastic Face Carnt Smile (White Out)* · Bummed* · Pills 'n' Thrills and Bellyaches* · Yes Please!* · It's Great When You're Straight...Yeah* · Stupid Stupid Stupid* · Our Darkest Days* · Lost in the Sound of Separation* · Define the Great Line* · Tourist* · Everything's the Rush* · Free Peace Sweet · Here Come the Tears* · Revelations · Libertine · How I Learned to Love the Bootboys* · Fin de Siècle · Welcome to the North* · Myths of the Near Future* · St. Jude · Falcon* · Anna · Concrete Love · Mapping the Rendezvous* · More. Again. Forever.* · Howdy!* · Beyond the Neighbourhood · Black Swan* · Gold Medal* · Some Friendly* · Between 10th and 11th* · Smile for Them* · Popaganda* · Up to Our Hips* · GNV FLA · From the Ashes · Trainwreck* · Decadence* · Controversy Loves Company · Dog Problems* · Cheer Up! · Out of Nothing* · The Charlatans* · Tellin' Stories* · Us and Us Only* · Pop Voodoo* · Lost Domain · Ups and Downsizing* · Unfun · Wake Up! · The Silence in Black and White · Spartacus · The Back Room · Butterfly House · Bivouac · Dear You · Wonderland* · I Believe* · Up at the Lake‎* · Simpatico* · You Cross My Path* · 101 Damnations* · Liquidizer* · Doubt* · Sing, Memory · England Made Me* · The Facts of Life · Passionoia · Modulate · It Means Everything* · A Storm in Heaven* · A Northern Soul*

Some reliable music sources

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 04:40, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 00:40, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Same Old Blood Rush with a New Touch for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Classic Albums: Pink Floyd – The Making of The Dark Side of the Moon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article's topic is not notable and its info can be covered on the page "Classic Albums".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 14:06, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I Still consider your edit to be redundant and useless. Plenty other artist albums use their official casing even if it 'iz uncoordinatED LIek THEIIZ' I don't see you or anyone else making these edits. Justin Bieber's purpose album for example. Uses the official spelling and casing as on the album. things like song titles and artist names shouldn't be changed "for the sake of english" these are copyrighted things and are the official way they're known. It does NOT come down to personal preference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XXEmoPunk911Xx (talk • contribs) 02:32, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's not personal preference, it's following a guideline that has been agreed upon by the community. Also, see MOS:TRADEMARKS: "Follow standard English text formatting and capitalization rules, regardless of the preference of trademark owners." Yeepsi (talk) 09:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose does follow the guideline, though. Some of the songs on the deluxe/Walmart editions with "to"/"in"/"the" in them are in lowercase, as per the guideline. Yeepsi (talk) 09:47, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you expand and revamp the article? 183.171.182.246 (talk) 06:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any interest in the band/that album, sorry. Yeepsi (talk) 10:19, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

...you might like to see this. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 00:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the GA! Yeepsi (talk) 01:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, saw you removed all the links to McTernan's name...his article was deleted at AfD, but he's a producer on dozens of noteworthy musicians' albums. I had hoped someone would eventually dig up enough information about him to reconstitute that article, but now that all the links were taken down, I doubt anybody will think to look now. If you come across interviews or other coverage of him, I'd be interested, as I'd very much like myself to put that one back up. Chubbles (talk) 21:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye for any interviews I come across. If you do restore the article, I'll gladly go back and re-add the links. Yeepsi (talk) 21:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yeepsi,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Remember the Laughter should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remember the Laughter .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ayo. Sent this up for GOCE to work on since I noticed it's got issues with prose, apparently. I noticed that you were the original GA nominator. If you don't intend to finish off this article, do I have your permission to nominate this at a later time? It'd probably be May before I nominate it, but still would like to have this post-hardcore classic up there. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 21:10, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure Danny, go for it. Yeepsi (talk) 22:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did a bit of clean-up with the extra tags and noticed most of the refs had died. I would gladly add archive links, but the Wayback Machine won't load for me, for some unknown reason. I did manage to replace a few of the dead refs with better sources, though, and added a bunch of new ones to the talk. Yeepsi (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're a citation wizard, Yeepsi. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 00:28, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article North (Something Corporate album) has been completed.

You'll notice that I archived one of the article’s citations (#1). I suggest you archive the rest of the article’s URLs as time allows. This ensures that the article's references are available "forever" and that it doesn’t develop "dead links" over time. The site I use is https://archive.org/web/. Simply copy the URL in the citation and paste it in the "Save Page Now" box on the archive.org site and click "Save". This creates a copy of the original page and provides you with a new URL to add to the original citation. If you look at the URL I've archived you'll see the syntax. You add the new URL to the end of the original citation like this: |archiveurl=http etc|archivedate=March 12, 2017}}. Not all websites allow archiving, so there's not much you can do about that unless there is an alternate citation you could use.

Good luck with the GAR.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Yeepsi (talk) 22:12, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited From the Screen to Your Stereo Part II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alternative Press. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Yeepsi, I'm not sure if you care about the band that much, but a user you reverted who's been trying to push through undiscussed changes every now and again on The Used discography since 2015 has been at it again over the past week or so. Would you be able to help keep an eye on the page? They've been moving singles and albums around willy-nilly and making other such unquestionable actions. Thanks! Ss112 06:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll keep an eye on the article. Yeepsi (talk) 10:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Boys Like Girls (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Audition. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TOP Stressed Out.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article New Again has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:41, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 18:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi: I've just started the c/e you requested and have not been able to resolve this issue in the lead.

In May "Faith (When I Let You Down)" was released as a single, along with its music video. In June, "This Is All Now" was released as a single, and on June 28, Taking Back Sunday was released through Warner Bros. and Sire Records. The band embarked on a tour of the US with Thursday in June and July. In July, a music video was released for "Faith (When I Let You Down)", followed by the release of the single "You Got Me" in August.

Was the music video released in May or August - you have two conflicting dates (underlined). Can you let me know? Thanks. Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Twofingered Typist: They're two different videos: one showing the recording process, as well as live footage, while the other has a narrative to it. I forgot to mention the difference when expanding the lead, my mistake. Yeepsi (talk) 20:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I should have read more carefully further on in the article - sorry. I've clarified the info in the lead. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:11, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Taking Back Sunday (album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Beggars Banquet tracks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ojorojo (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Let It Bleed tracks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ojorojo (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Exile on Main St. tracks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ojorojo (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Sticky Fingers tracks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ojorojo (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article New Again you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 04:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Taking Back Sunday (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 04:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I have been a bit slow on these, I saw there was a huge backlog so grabbed a couple hoping it would motivate me to actually review them. Just been a bit busy IRL, reviewing another article now then I will hit yours up. Thanks for your patience! Kees08 (Talk) 06:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright, no rush. Yeepsi (talk) 09:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Black Cloud (Pink Floyd song). Since you had some involvement with the Black Cloud (Pink Floyd song) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:13, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on this! Looks nothing like the page I previously visited. Solid. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 15:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Danny! Yeepsi (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article What to Do When You Are Dead has been completed.

Good luck with the GAR.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:03, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 13:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Taking Back Sunday (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Taking Back Sunday (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 04:21, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may have seen the very useful InternetArchiveBot go around archiving stuff. A friend of mine notified me recently that it is now free to use for any user. It's a bot which makes it incredibly easy to archive sources. I can archive five articles' worth of sources (completely) in 45-90 seconds. Check out IAbot! [1] (Forgive me if this sounds like an advertisement, like seriously, you need to use this, your workload on fixing sources will minimize greatly.) I could run some of the GAs we have mutual concern about if you'd like. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 02:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'd appreciate if you could run it on the GAs. Yeepsi (talk) 19:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that reflist|2 is deprecated per Template:Reflist#Columns. If you don't know the best ways to format these are:

• {{reflist|35em}} for 2 columns (equivalent to reflist|2)
• {{reflist|30em}} for 3 columns (equivalent to reflist|3)
• {{reflist|20em}} for 4 columns (equivalent to reflist|4)

Thanks. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 01:50, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there! Just finished the copyedit on So Wrong, It's Right, and I'd recommend adding some citations in the lead, as there are none, and updating the bonus tracklist. Other than that, not too shabby! ɯɐɔ 💬 22:31, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mm! Before I forget -- I'm also working on Nothing Personal for you, too. Gotta love ATL. ɯɐɔ 💬 22:32, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the CE! According to WP:LEADCITE, citations don't need to be in the lead unless it's some extraordinary claim or a quote. Yeepsi (talk) 22:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article New Again you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:New Again for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 21:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good Articles: Music needs the help of willing reviewers!

Hi there. You nominated an article for evaluation against the good article criteria some time ago, but I noticed you have yet to review an article yourself. Although it's not mandatory, it would be helpful if every user who creates a nomination also reviewed at least one other article, as this would help clear the massive backlog. Reviewing someone else's article can also help you in the long run: every article reviewed brings yours one position closer to the top of the nominations list! If you worked on the article you nominated, chances are you're already familiar with the six good article criteria. It really isn't hard to review, and may take an experienced editor only a few hours to complete. If you have the time and would like to help, please click here, take a moment to figure out which article you'd like to review, then click on its (start review) button. Thank you for reading, and if you need assistance with your review at any point, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page and I'll respond to you as soon as I can. Homeostasis07 (talk)

Please format personnel per the WP:MOSALBUM guidelines.

Name – function

Not:
Function: Name.

Thanks. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 10:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've always done Name – function, though. User:Thedivinemania added Function: Name. Yeepsi (talk) 10:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Nothing Personal (All Time Low album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 21:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Based on a True Story (The Starting Line album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article So Wrong, It's Right has been completed.

I marked a sentence in the Composition and Recording section that I think needs clarification. It's an interesting quote, but it needs to be elaborated upon because, as it stands now, it raises questions that aren't answered.

I had a look to see why citation #75 is displaying the way it is, but I couldn't figure out how to get rid of the instructions. Perhaps you know?

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Exile on Main St. tracks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ojorojo (talk) 18:19, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article North (Something Corporate album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 18:20, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article North (Something Corporate album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:North (Something Corporate album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 02:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article North (Something Corporate album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:North (Something Corporate album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 23:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Full Moon Fever tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:30, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nothing Personal (All Time Low album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 13:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I remember almost two years ago now you attempted to nominate this and had no success. Do you wish for a co-nomination, or would you rather I nominated it like I did with Selfish Machines? I think I have it all fixed up. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 23:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can nominate it Danny, all yours a la Selfish Machines. Yeepsi (talk) 00:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Man Overboard (Man Overboard album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 22:25, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Sound the Alarm (Saves the Day album) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Good luck with the GAN

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:24, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 13:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A long time ago, I made some edits to A Lesson in Romantics in the hopes of seeing it one day promoted to "good article" status. I got sidetracked... like, really sidetracked... and then lo-and-behold I notice years later that the album has been promoted! I presented a barnstar to DannyMusicEditor, who told me that you also co-wrote and co-nominated the article, and so I present you with this belated barnstar:

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Yeepsi for helping to promote A Lesson in Romantics to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:43, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Yeepsi (talk) 17:25, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I should probably clarify I'm in Eastern USA so it's still Halloween here, LOL.

Facepalm Thank you for catching that. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 16:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MusicforthePeople. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Happiness Is (Taking Back Sunday album) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Esprit15d • talk • contribs 19:13, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the CE! Yeepsi (talk) 19:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great work once again! A suggestion: Taking Back Sunday's bio is suffering terribly. It seems someone is picking up on this and fixing the article up little by little, but have you ever thought to add some information you're putting in the album articles into the biography itself? Just thought I'd bring this to your attention. dannymusiceditor ^{Speak up!} 03:05, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Danny. Funnily enough, I did actually plan on working on their main article after I had expanded their albums (something I've also been meaning to do with ADTR, Mayday, etc). Since I'm more or less done (aside from sending to GOCE) with their newest album, I might get round to their bio later this week or next week. Yeepsi (talk) 14:31, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just want to suggest that this might not be the last word about how to structure discographical information on Wikipedia. There are a number of editors who unilaterally redirect any album page without a battery of reviews attached to it to an artist page, without merging any content. I have never thought this to be constructive, and there are at least some people who agree with me; there was a recent conversation at WT:MUSIC (here) in which this was debated somewhat further, with little headway. So I guess I just want you to be sure, for yourself, that you're doing the right thing for the project in hewing to the letter of that contested guideline. Chubbles (talk) 05:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]