User talk:Jruderman

Hi, Jesse. Can you help me flesh out the Memory safety article?

It's not an area I'm very familiar with. Josephgrossberg 18:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For this excellent rewrite of Fuzz testing. Great work! FlyingToaster 16:26, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing excellent work, including vandalism revision, and you deserve better tools. Per your request, I've granted you rollback. FlyingToaster 18:33, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Mind if I change the category of the userbox to the subcat Category:Wikipedians who use Mozilla Nightly? --illythr (talk) 22:23, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jruderman/Userboxes/FirefoxTrunk? Sure, go for it. --Jruderman (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits have been dearly missed at the Firefox article. Come back! Thanks! ҭᴙᴇᴡӌӌ 00:28, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoy this as you hunt more security bugs! →Enock4seth (talk) 20:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Flame Barnstar
		Thanks for your open-minded and careful attempts at balancing the various bioethics articles I've been working on for the last few weeks. Sometimes I don't recognize my own bias, and am unironically thankful when someone like you helps me reflect on it it more. Biohistorian15 (talk) 06:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to state that, as far as I am concerned, you are hereby exempted from any accusations of Wikihounding that may arise if you edit more in the content area; something I've normally been very critical of before. Biohistorian15 (talk) 06:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Minor barnstar
	For making a few minor but necessary edits to Political parties in the United States. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 16:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate on what you meant at Talk:2024 CrowdStrike incident#Poll for best new name by "X/10"? --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have given each title a rating out of ten and I encourage other participants to do the same. Range voting is the appropriate method when some choices are similar to each other and when participants trust each other to be honest regarding the strength of their convictions. It is okay if some participants decide to indicate which is their favorite, instead of or in addition to writing "10/10", because this is the fuzzy consensus version of whatever voting method we choose. Jruderman (talk) 23:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - Don't forget to state that "10" is "best". --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Done I edited my comment there to say "on a scale of 1 (terrible) to 10 (perfect)" Jruderman (talk) 23:55, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you. I can make incorrect assumptions about what other people will find familiar or obvious. I appreciate your help in ensuring that I write in a way that is clear to the intended audience. Jruderman (talk) 23:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Reply - YW, in some countries, multiple choice means ALL correct answers, in others, it means the BEST answer. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]