Jump to content

Talk:Choc ice

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Choc Ice Day

[edit]

I'm not fond of that passage about how March 3 is being increasingly celebrated as Choc Ice Day and the founders of Choc Ice Day want it to become as big as Pancake Day. Are there any claims to March 3 actually being celebrated somewhere as Choc Ice Day? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinderlei (talkcontribs) 16:45, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This has been removed some time between then and now ... 77.96.249.228 (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Racism

[edit]

The whole "racism" portion of the page seems to be quite unimportant. There's one instance in which someone calls someone else a "Choc Ice", and that's about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.123.39.243 (talk) 00:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

comment Thanks for discussing your proposed change. Please have a look at WP:BRD - Bold, Revert. Discuss: you have been Bold, I have Reverted you, and now we are Discussing it. Please don't make the change again in the meantime or people may feel that you are edit-warring. Thanks 77.96.249.228 (talk) 22:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've raised this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Discrimination and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink. With a bit of luck there'll be interested editors along to help discuss it. Fwiw I'm unsure myself. It does seem perhaps a bit undue emphasis at present but maybe needs mentioning briefly? Oreo does this quite well and has a good internal link, but it's probably a much more well-known usage. I'm not planning on making a big fight out of this either way. I'd just rather see the removal of referenced content discussed first. Consensus, and all that. :) Cheers 213.205.251.29 (talk) 08:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC) (Same editor as 249.228 above but on mobile phone.)[reply]
Also added at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Food and drink/Desserts task force. 77.96.249.228 (talk) 23:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I AGREE that this article seems very unbalanced - more than half the article seems to be taken up with a description of a single event, the racism controversy. Would it not be better if this article had more on the history of choc ices, or the nutritional value of choc ices? Vorbee (talk) 19:50, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]