Talk:Monster Hunter: World

Latest comment: 16 days ago by Cukie Gherkin in topic Merge Proposal

Monster Hunter World - a main series game or a spinoff?

edit

I'm not that well versed in the Monster Hunter franchise, but from what I've gathered, the team behind Monster Hunter 4 (the main series) is behind this, which would imply it's the first main title in the next generation (whereas Generations/X and XX are still from the 4th generation). Can Monster Hunter fans explain what defines a mainline Monster Hunter and why this one is a spinoff, platform bias and local co-op aside (since up to Tri, it didn't have local co-op)? WikiVent (talk) 06:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Right now, I don't think we have enough info yet. Spinoffs have generally features very different gameplay modes compared to the standard hunting approach, but that's not 100% true (Frontiers). Capcom will likely push more out this week so we'll have a better idea, but right now, it feels as a main game in the series. There's no narrative structure, so it's hard to go by that. --MASEM (t) 06:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

[1]

I should be getting my copy soon but GI will usually post these stories soon too. --MASEM (t) 14:33, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Open world

edit

The article says it is an open world game, yet it is not part of the open world video games category. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metalheadgamer (talkcontribs) 03:36, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Writing for Wikipedia

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 12 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): TheGreatAndross (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by VLSG262 (talk) 00:05, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Merge Proposal

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Defaulting to not merged due to a lack of real explanation from the nominator and multiple people who are, at least, skeptical of the idea. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 07:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was thinking we should merge the Iceborne expansion page into this, as the Sunbreak expansion of Rise doesn't have a separate page. What do y'all think? SirGamers (talk) 15:25, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Either that or we split Sunbreak into it's own page SirGamers (talk) 15:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Just because one page does it like this and another page doesn't doesn't mean we need to force conformity between them. Masem (t) 16:21, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well, it might still be a good idea SirGamers (talk) 17:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
What would the benefit be for merging it? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 19:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oppose: I originally split the article on WP:SIZESPLIT principle. The article for Rise is not as long as World. Sunbreak is likely notable on its own though, and a separate article for it is viable. OceanHok (talk) 15:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.