Here is Google's Asynchronous Analytics tracking code:
<script type="text/javascript">
var _gaq = _gaq || [];
_gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-XXXXX-Y']);
_gaq.push(['_trackPageview']);
(function() {
var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true;
ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www') + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js';
var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s);
})();
</script>
If you ask me it's pretty ugly. It could be condensed into this (Credit: Mathias):
<script>
var _gaq=[['_setAccount','UA-XXXXX-X'],['_trackPageview']];
(function(d,t){var g=d.createElement(t),s=d.getElementsByTagName(t)[0];
g.src=('https:'==location.protocol?'//ssl':'//www')+'.google-analytics.com/ga.js';
s.parentNode.insertBefore(g,s)}(document,'script'));
</script>
But why can't we just use the HTML5 async
attribute and a protocol-relative URL?
<script src="//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js" async></script>
<script>var _gaq=[['_setAccount','UA-XXXXX-X'],['_trackPageview']];</script>
With the protocol-relative URL we avoid having to check for the location.protocol
, and the async
attribute should take care of unobtrusive loading in modern browsers, and will gracefully degrade in others.
Isn't this better?