Pink's Reviews > King Leopold's Ghost
King Leopold's Ghost
by
by
![14084605](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1366445251p2/14084605.jpg)
The fault in this book is set out by Hochschild both in the introduction and again in his afterword. Here's what he says -
Looking back on this book after an interval of some years has reminded me of where I wish I could have done more. My greatest frustration lay in how hard it was to portray individual Africans as full-fledged actors in this story. Historians often face such difficulties, since the written record from colonizers, the rich, and the powerful is always more plentiful than it is from the colonized, the poor, and the powerless. Again and again it felt unfair to me that we know so much about the character and daily life of Leopold and so little about those of Congolese indigenous rulers at the time, and even less about the lives of villagers who died gathering rubber. Or that so much is on the record about Stanley and so little about those who were perhaps his nearest African counterparts: the coastal merchants already leading caravans of porters with trading goods into the interior when he first began staking out the Congo for Leopold. Of those who worked against the regime, we know the entire life stories of Europeans or Americans like Morel, Casement, and Sheppard, but almost nothing of resistance leaders like Kandolo or Mulume Niama who lost their lives as rebels. This skews the story in a way that, unintentionally, almost seems to diminish the centrality of the Congolese themselves.
And that's what's wrong with it. However I appreciated that Hochschild recognised this problem himself, but still felt it was a story worth telling, even with these limitations.
Looking back on this book after an interval of some years has reminded me of where I wish I could have done more. My greatest frustration lay in how hard it was to portray individual Africans as full-fledged actors in this story. Historians often face such difficulties, since the written record from colonizers, the rich, and the powerful is always more plentiful than it is from the colonized, the poor, and the powerless. Again and again it felt unfair to me that we know so much about the character and daily life of Leopold and so little about those of Congolese indigenous rulers at the time, and even less about the lives of villagers who died gathering rubber. Or that so much is on the record about Stanley and so little about those who were perhaps his nearest African counterparts: the coastal merchants already leading caravans of porters with trading goods into the interior when he first began staking out the Congo for Leopold. Of those who worked against the regime, we know the entire life stories of Europeans or Americans like Morel, Casement, and Sheppard, but almost nothing of resistance leaders like Kandolo or Mulume Niama who lost their lives as rebels. This skews the story in a way that, unintentionally, almost seems to diminish the centrality of the Congolese themselves.
And that's what's wrong with it. However I appreciated that Hochschild recognised this problem himself, but still felt it was a story worth telling, even with these limitations.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
King Leopold's Ghost.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
January 9, 2015
– Shelved
September 16, 2016
–
Started Reading
September 25, 2016
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)
date
newest »
![Down arrow](https://cdn.statically.io/img/s.gr-assets.com/assets/down_arrow-1e1fa5642066c151f5e0136233fce98a.gif)
message 1:
by
Miltiadis
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Sep 14, 2019 12:49AM
![Miltiadis Michalopoulos](https://cdn.statically.io/img/images.gr-assets.com/users/1375644385p1/22814838.jpg)
reply
|
flag