Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove TheDocumentFoundation.LibreOffice.LTS #162187

Open
SpecterShell opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 11 comments
Open

Remove TheDocumentFoundation.LibreOffice.LTS #162187

SpecterShell opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 11 comments
Labels
Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work.

Comments

@SpecterShell
Copy link
Contributor

Description of the new feature/enhancement

I'm thinking about removing the TheDocumentFoundation.LibreOffice.LTS package and only keeping the non-LTS one, as the LTS one no longer makes sense:

  1. The 7.x series got removed from the download page some hours before this post today.
  2. The LibreOffice auto updater is now suggesting 7.x series users to update to 24.2.4, which is the current non-LTS version.
    image
  3. The 7.x has been EOL'd.

Also see: chocolatey-community/chocolatey-packages#2496

Proposed technical implementation details (optional)

No response

@SpecterShell SpecterShell added the Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work. label Jul 9, 2024
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added the Needs-Triage This work item needs to be triaged by a member of the core team. label Jul 9, 2024
@vikingnope
Copy link
Contributor

Starting removal

@a-mnich
Copy link
Contributor

a-mnich commented Jul 10, 2024

#162282

@vikingnope I think you've mentioned the wrong PR here :D

@vikingnope
Copy link
Contributor

vikingnope commented Jul 10, 2024

oh yep sorry, removed it now

@vikingnope
Copy link
Contributor

@SpecterShell, should I remove the SDK LTS as well? TheDocumentFoundation.LibreOffice.SDK.LTS

@uwekoenig
Copy link

By deleting the ID "TheDocumentFoundation.LibreOffice.LTS" systems of users who use
winget upgrade TheDocumentFoundation.LibreOffice.LTS
are affected in a not expectable way, because winget is suggesting to upgrade to TheDocumentFoundation.LibreOffice (without .LTS) now.

The currently used download link for 24.2.4.2 is wrong.

@vikingnope
Copy link
Contributor

By deleting the ID "TheDocumentFoundation.LibreOffice.LTS" systems of users who use winget upgrade TheDocumentFoundation.LibreOffice.LTS are affected in a not expectable way, because winget is suggesting to upgrade to TheDocumentFoundation.LibreOffice (without .LTS) now.

The currently used download link for 24.2.4.2 is wrong.

LTS is no longer supported by LibeOffice and this is why it has been removed. I will check out ythe current download link for 24.2.4.2.

@vikingnope
Copy link
Contributor

vikingnope commented Jul 11, 2024

I think there might be an outage with their CDN, there is also a new update 24.2.5.1 so I will add that

EDIT: It seems to be going online and offline currently

@uwekoenig
Copy link

Dear all,

Until now LibreOffice was calling the versions Stable and Fresh on their website. I think to have a stable (or LTS) ID would nevertheless make sense. At times like now the latest (fresh) and stable (LTS) would be the same version. In one month when 24.8 will be released the LTS will stay on 24.2 and 24.8 would be there additionally.

What do you think?

@SpecterShell
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think there might be an outage with their CDN, there is also a new update 24.2.5.1 so I will add that

EDIT: It seems to be going online and offline currently

That version is actually 24.2.5.2 not 24.2.5.1. I'm fixing it.

@SpecterShell
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dear all,

Until now LibreOffice was calling the versions Stable and Fresh on their website. I think to have a stable (or LTS) ID would nevertheless make sense. At times like now the latest (fresh) and stable (LTS) would be the same version. In one month when 24.8 will be released the LTS will stay on 24.2 and 24.8 would be there additionally.

What do you think?

It is somehow similar to NodeJS, which has a current (non-LTS) channel and active (LTS) channel, and a major version (e.g., 22.x) in the current channel may go to the active channel when the current channel is moving to the next major version (e.g., 23.x).

@stephengillie stephengillie removed the Needs-Triage This work item needs to be triaged by a member of the core team. label Jul 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Issue-Feature Complex enough to require an in depth planning process and actual budgeted, scheduled work.
5 participants