Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFUP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP back to remove content without explanation, soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:17, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Moving IP address causing vandalism JP (Talk) 06:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep making cosmetic edits and ramping up the number of revisions in the article for no reason. Frost 07:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: A level of page vandalism Historyenjoyer10 (talk) 10:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 10:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: One user keeps editing neo-fascism into it even tough it was agreed on in talks to leave it out since its not correct Ensyloium (talk) 10:10, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: One User keeps adding fake news without sources Ensyloium (talk) 10:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:31, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: One User keeps adding fake news even tough it was agreed on in talks to not add it Ensyloium (talk) 10:13, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:31, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 10:31, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 10:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: all articles on Israel - Palestine articles should have this this article was recently created. vandalism Astropulse (talk) 11:05, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 11:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Reason: I have misused the name of this page by people who like to create pages they have nothing to do with, without understanding anything about the rules of free Wikipedia, we ask that the barrier "This page is now protected" be removed and we cooperate with people who Expert Wikipedia creator. We strongly request that our proposal be accepted. 192.145.175.192 (talk) 07:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Who are 'we'? An organisation of some kind? -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: No nessecary of protection Historyenjoyer10 (talk) 10:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – This page isn't currently protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:09, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    I wish to contest the following line in the article: "Cheatle also acknowledged that the Secret Service had rebuffed requests for additional resources for Trump's security detail in the two years leading up to the assassination attempt." First, this line has no footnotes to reference it's origin. Looking through the sites linked in the footnotes previous to this line and the line following it, nothing indicates the veracity of that statement. Instead, one can see lawmakers trying to infer this conclusion during her Congressional testimony regarding the attempted assassination of former President Trump, while she denies it. 2601:547:CA01:3C4E:8BC:6A39:2650:79D4 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.