User talk:Rowan Forest: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Editor of the Week/Recipient notification |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Hi... Could you please be participating in [[Template talk:Infobox military unit#rfc_945239E|request for comment on '''Template talk:Infobox military unit''']]. ([[User:Ckfasdf|Ckfasdf]] ([[User talk:Ckfasdf|talk]]) 07:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC)) |
Hi... Could you please be participating in [[Template talk:Infobox military unit#rfc_945239E|request for comment on '''Template talk:Infobox military unit''']]. ([[User:Ckfasdf|Ckfasdf]] ([[User talk:Ckfasdf|talk]]) 07:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC)) |
||
==Editor of the Week== |
|||
{| style="border: 2px solid lightgray; background-color: #fafafa" color:#aaa" |
|||
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | [[File:Editor of the week barnstar.svg|100px]] |
|||
|rowspan="2" | |
|||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; color:#606570" |'''Editor of the Week''' |
|||
|- |
|||
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 2px solid lightgray" |Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]] in recognition of {{{briefreason}}}. Thank you for the great contributions! <span style="color:#a0a2a5">(courtesy of the [[WP:WER|<span style="color:#80c0ff">Wikipedia Editor Retention Project</span>]])</span> |
|||
|} |
|||
[[User:{{{nominator}}}]] submitted the following nomination for [[WP:Editor of the Week|Editor of the Week]]: |
|||
:{{{nominationtext}}} |
|||
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: |
|||
<pre>{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}</pre> |
|||
Thanks again for your efforts! ―[[User:Buster7|<span style="color:#775C57;">'''''Buster7'''''</span>]] [[User talk:Buster7|<span style="color:#AAA;">☎</span>]] 11:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:43, 7 October 2019
Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Rowan Forest,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
ET Status report?
If interested - Latest comments re ET by astronomer Seth Shostak[1] - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Drbogdan: I think this is part of the astrobiology PR regarding ExoMars rover and NASA's 2020 rover. They are focused on biosignatures at the surface, which has not been done since the Viking landers in the 1970s so it is great and will certainly engage a lot of people. But I doubt we are any closer at discovering biosignatures since the surface has not changed since the Viking program and it remains extremely hostile in chemistry, dryness, low pressure, radiation and temperature. Past chemical biosignatures must be long gone, but I hope not if they look >5-7 m deep in lake sediments (as compared to 2 m for ExoMars rover). Otherwise I think the best they will get at the surface will have to be bioforms (fossilized inorganic shapes) - which at microscopic level are not enough to make the call. IMO, science missions will have to look at the deep subsurface (underground, under the ice caps, or inside deep caves), or at least land a payload that can actually sample the methane isotopes in the atmosphere -which is NOT currently planned for any rover or lander in the near or long term. I predict that these 2 rovers will come up empty handed, so SpaceX will use that fact to justify landing non-sterile equipment and eventually humans. Rowan Forest (talk) 22:45, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
- @Rowan Forest: Thank you for your reply - your comments describe the current status of the search for ET *very well* IMO - I *entirely* agree with nearly everything you've noted - Thanks again for your comments - they're all *greatly* appreciated - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 23:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Shostak, Seth (4 October 2019). "We may be closing in on the discovery of alien life. Are we prepared? - New robotic craft bound for Mars should give us our best shot at finding life on the Red Planet". NBC News. Retrieved 5 October 2019.
Please comment on Template talk:Infobox military unit
Hi... Could you please be participating in request for comment on Template talk:Infobox military unit. (Ckfasdf (talk) 07:12, 7 October 2019 (UTC))
Editor of the Week
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of {{{briefreason}}}. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
[[User:{{{nominator}}}]] submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
- {{{nominationtext}}}
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Thanks again for your efforts! ―Buster7 ☎ 11:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)