Jump to content

Talk:Afrique Victime/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PerfectSoundWhatever (talk | contribs) at 16:26, 8 July 2024 (review). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PerfectSoundWhatever (talk · contribs) 16:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry User:TheNuggeteer, but this article is a long way from meeting the GA criteria, so I would have to quickfail it. It fails GA criterion #3, due to not being broad in its coverage. Almost all sections are undeveloped, and sources clearly exist to build out these sections. Here are a few points if you still seek to bring this article to GA:

  • There is no information on when/how the album was recorded, and what happened during the writing process.
  • There is no information on any of the songs, how they are structured, how they sound, what instruments they use, what genres they are.
  • The rock/blues/assouf part is unsourced (big no-no for genres, see WP:GWAR) and is inexplicably under "track listing"
  • Reception is three sentences despite there being ~10 full length reviews in reputable publications.
  • Personnel list is unsourced
  • Reception should be higher than charts. You can use the ordering of the headers in MOS:ALBUM as a guide.
  • Information about their touring would be useful. As well, a section on the release.
  • The album's title should not be bolded in "Background"; it is already bolded in the lead.
  • Should be more information about the "companion documentary"
  • Why is there a header2 "Afrique Victime" under "Meaning"? No reason to make a subsection when its the only thing in the parent section.
  • Discuss themes, political context, etc. in more depth.
  • "Sexism" should not be capitalized
  • Other than the metacritic sentence being gramatically poor, "a popular song/album reviewer" is incorrect. Metacritic is a review aggregator, not a review site itself. Also, I think that the ranking was referring to user scores. (I'm not sure we use that)

Quick spotcheck

from this version.

  • ref 4: only has the rating. all good.
  • ref 9: this is a duplicate ref with [1]. references check out.
  • ref 17: all good. If you use this for prose, (which you should) add the author (Allison Hussey)
  • ref 31: just a chart, all good
  • ref 34: another chart, all good

I would recommend for you to read other album GAs/FAs to get an idea of the level of quality required for these articles. Short album GAs are very rare, because I find that music publications tend to write longer articles, and usually there are interviews to be found. For example, I wrote an album GA on an album with essentially only 3 reviews (Don't Wake Me Up) and I still was able to write out each section into a good paragraph and cover all the broad points. If you are intending to continue improving this article, please feel free to message me on my talk page, as I have decent experience writing album articles. — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 16:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]