User talk:MGA73

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 61

File:Oldwikivoyage Logo-Proposal03.svg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: This file is an exact duplicate or scaled-down version of File:Oldwikivoyage LogoLang.svg. If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Nutshinou ^Talk! 14:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:SwamiPushkarni.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

-- DaxServer (talk) 11:20, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear MGA73,

I think these two Mushroom Observer DRs Here and Here can be deleted and replaced by my suggested replacement images sadly. But it is up to you to decide here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Leoboudv! I was too slow but someone else fixed! --MGA73 (talk) 06:17, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment: Thank you for your attention anyway. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:46, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SwamiPushkarni.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

MGA73 (talk) 14:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:IT-Rom-stpaul-medaillons.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

81.41.177.91 13:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Michael,

Can you kindly review this rare fungus please?

• File:Austroboletus mutabilis by Ray Palmer 2.jpg

Unfortunately, I had to crop this photo. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Leoboudv: Sure. In future you can just upload original wait 1 minute for the bot to review and then crop on top :-) --MGA73 (talk) 10:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank You Michael. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:16, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Escher Synagog 2009-01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հա��երեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dan Hogenson - Brazos Bend State Park.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Nv8200p (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Michael,

Can you decide whether to pass or fail this image? The current license for this image is CC BY NC SA 4.0 but the archive version may have been CC BY SA 4.0 at upload. I revoked my license review as the archive version does not have a photo...although I think it is the same one since it has same source. If it cannot be passed, then its better to fail it. it is only 1 image.

I am working on Lymantria's review list but it is a long lot...and I have removed those images which I marked. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment: If you want to help review maybe 10-20 images, please do. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoboudv! When I look at https://laji.fi/taxon/MX.59786/identification I see the text below the photo:

"Tekijänoikeuksien haltija: Saara Salmela Lisenssi: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0 Kuvateksti: OP: Oulun yliopiston Tietotalo 25.7.2022"

When I look at https://web.archive.org/web/20221215004439/https://laji.fi/taxon/MX.59786/identification I also see the text below the photo:

"Tekijänoikeuksien haltija: Saara Salmela Lisenssi: CC-BY-NC-SA-4.0 Kuvateksti: OP: Oulun yliopiston Tietotalo 25.7.2022"

So in both cases the license is NC. Do you see something else?

The list reminds me I once made this en:User:MGA73/sandbox with a few mushroomobserver.org files. --MGA73 (talk) 07:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment: Yes...you are right. On the archive link the license first shows as CC BY SA 4.0 and then changes to CC BY NC SA 4.0. I will have to file a DR here. There is too much doubt here. By the way, feel free to review 10-20 images on this Lymantria's review list Best Wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment: The problematic image is now deleted Michael. Today I reviewed more than 25 images but this Lymantria's review list is still big. Feel free to review a few more if you have some time. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Leoboudv! Yeah there are still many left. I did a few too. I try to clean up GFDL files across wikis. It seems there are about 163,000 files licensed GFDL. Guess it will take some time... --MGA73 (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment: I have always said that the main strengths of wikipedia and is also its main weakness....it relies on unpaid volunteers who also have busy personal lives. And with the cost of living being so high in Canada, there is only so much or so little time that I can spend on wikipedia/wikicommons. Today, in Canada, many people cannot afford real estate and and yes! Beautiful Canada has a homeless problem sadly in parks because our PM Trudeau brings in too many people into Canada at the same time and it is happening in many cities in my country: https://ottawacitizen.com/feature/tent-city-nation The scary thing is many people with mental illness also live in homeless shelters. But they won't mention this in a visiting Canada google search. For you, it is better or safer to visit Malaysia or Thailand where you can buy Pierre Cardin shirts cheaper in the shopping malls because the local Malaysian or Thai money is worth so low in value. I still have the Pierre Cardin business shirt I bought for a cheap price when I visited my relatives in Malaysia around KL or Kuala Lumpur. In Canada, the shirt would cost a fortune. Life is so expensive here. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can only hope that it will get better. Most countries find out that migration is a problem. Someone said that in Denmark 50 years ago and they were called racists and the parliament ignored them. 20 years ago the parliament changed laws and made it harder for migrants. Other countries called Denmark racist. Now many countries do what Denmark did 20 years ago. Hopefully Canada will also get there one day. --MGA73 (talk) 12:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]