Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

Note

  • For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
  • Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
  • Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp.
  • Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s). {{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}} is available for this.
  • Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.


Please consider blocking Aommyabrina (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) for repeated copyright violations despite a final warning from an administrator. Thank you. -- Librovore (talk) 22:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done The derivative works are from Commons. They uploaded them without proper attribution (before I added it), thus making them copyright violations. I have blocked this user's account.
@Librovore: I realize we're understaffed, but if you have the time and patience, I'd recommend that you add attribution rather than just mark as copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:22, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded. - Jmabel ! talk 19:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Though looking at these now, they were pretty useless. Still, I'd probably have fixed the licensing & nominated for deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 19:13, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yasarhossain07

0x0a (talk) 10:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:06, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saul907

New sock of Malttew9983 (talk · contribs), again uploading copyvios of Panamanian politicians. Taichi (talk) 22:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done by Mdaniels5757. Yann (talk) 19:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I, as an admin on enwiki, have been dealing with socks of Vinayvinyill (talk · contribs) (see sockpuppet investigation and list of blocked socks) many of whom have also been uploading images with dubious claims of "own work" on Commons. Most, possibly all, these images are of the Kannada actor Darshan. The currently known socks are:

although several new ones have been created almost everyday, recently. Bringing this to the attention of Commons admins so that they can deal with the copyright and socking issues as appropriate. If there is a better venue/process to report this, just let me know; would appreciate a ping since I don't check Commons too regularly. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 04:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Partially done I blocked all the ones that were active and that user:Yann hadn't already blocked earlier in the week. The remainder have never made edits on this project. It should be relatively easy to set up an edit filter to flag new uploads from socks of this person, but that's beyond my skill. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:37, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@The Squirrel Conspiracy I'd say this account as well - Madhu Chakravarthy (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log -- DaxServer (talk) 19:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done All blocked. Yann (talk) 19:46, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @The Squirrel Conspiracy and Yann: Noting for completeness that there are a new bunch of CU confirmed socks listed here, which I expect are already in the process of being reported/blocked on Commons. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 16:44, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Abecedare: Looks like the new batch are global locked. As long as they don't have any uploads, that's more than enough for us. If they do have any uploads, please feel free to ping us or put {{speedy|CSD F1 by [[:Category:Sockpuppets_of_Viratvini11]]}} on the files. They'll get zapped pretty quickly if you do. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sexy_girl.jpg

Please lock forever File:Sexy_girl.jpg to level "sysop only". Repeated upload of bullshit. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:47, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --A.Savin 22:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shanghaishift

SCP-2000 03:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Blocked. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Modern primat

User talk:Modern primat IP is disturbing me constantly. please put 1 month protection to stop IPs. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 20:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Set to "autoconfirmed only" for 3 months. - Jmabel ! talk 20:36, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block request for User:MFOzcan

MFOzcan (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log An account solely for the purpose of vandalism All the best -- Chuck Talk 22:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done by The Squirrel Conspiracy Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please semi-protect this filename because of persistant uploading/sockpuppetry. Jonteemil (talk) 10:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Semi-protection is a good choice. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prariwat Nuanma (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) has been blocked several times for uploading unfree files after warnings. After his last block expired, he is now back with unfree files again. So, please consider blocking him again as you think fit. Thank you. -- Librovore (talk) 10:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. 6 months block. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please semi-protect this filename (and delete it if it's not already deleted) because of persistant uploading/sockpuppetry. Same as #File:REAL MALABAR FC.png. Jonteemil (talk) 18:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Deleted and semi-protected. Abzeronow (talk) 18:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CojimarMorro739 (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information)

Blocked on en-wiki for using alt account JHG65hsda to post CojimarMorro739's images on articles and talk pages, promoting a Miami jewelry business called CRM. Huntthetroll (talk) 00:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider blocking Yothaland (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) for being a sockpuppet of Aommyabrina (talk · contribs). Thank you. -- Librovore (talk) 15:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

L. Beck

Repeatedly and despite warnings, he removes files from the obviously appropriate category, because he misinterprets the term "overcategorization". Although the principles of categorization were explained to him already in December 2023, he clearly refuses to understand and accept them and continues with mass disruptive editing. He removes images of Pravčická brána as the dominant subject from the category of Pravčická brána, formerly he removed images of the chapel in Hřensko from the category of the chapel in Hřensko etc.

ŠJů (talk) 05:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Morgen! Ich beschäftige mich schon sehr lange eingehend mit dem Kategoriensystem hier auf Commons und übrigens auch mit Themen wie dem Editwar. Es ist ja schön, dass du eine Diskussion gestartet hast (bei der du mich ganz nebenbei gesagt persönlich diskreditierst), führst aber weiterhin unbegründet deine Änderungen durch, die eben schlicht ergreifend zur Überkategorisierung und damit in einer solch großen Kategorie zu massiven Chaosproblemen führen. Auch wenn es deine eigenen Bilder sind, hast du dich an die Richtlinien und Standards beim Kategorisieren von Bildern zu halten. Lukas Beck (talk) 05:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes exactly. The principles of categorization must first be understood before one can apply them. If some individual has not understood the principles and rules and disrupts the categorization and causes chaos with mass disruptive editing, it is necessary to solve it immediately. Your way of interpretation really deviates from the rules and established and community-used practice. If someone does not accept that the photo of Pravčická brána belongs to the category of Pravčická brána, then it is difficult to find a starting point for further discussion. Attempts to explain have clearly failed. --ŠJů (talk) 05:31, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Du sortierst Bilder doppelt, teilweise dreifach in einen Kategorienbaum ein. Das ist so nicht akzeptabel und genau das ist der Grund, warum wir Richtlinien für COM:Overcat haben. Ich finde es toll, dass du dir die Mühe gemacht hast, sämtliche Unterkategorien für das Prebischtor zu erstellen, aber dann sei auch so konsequent in deinem Handeln und nehme doppelte und dreifache Kategorien raus. Lukas Beck (talk) 05:34, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Du zeigst mir mit deiner Argumentation immer wieder aufs Neue, dass du das Kategoriensystem nicht verstanden hast. Lukas Beck (talk) 05:35, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]